TRANSLATE

The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Atypical variants of driver genes in Ph-negative MPN

By Sabina Ray

Share:

May 20, 2024

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in MPN.


A mutation in driver genes, such as JAK2, MPL, and CALR, is one of the main criteria for diagnosing Philadelphia (Ph)-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). The co-existence of mutations in atypical variants of driver genes may also impact the JAK-STAT pathway and thereby MPN disease severity.

Here, we summarize a study by Wang et al.1 published in Cancer Medicine investigating atypical variants of driver mutations using next-generation sequencing (NGS).

Study design1

  • Patients from China with an initial diagnosis of Ph-negative MPN with JAK2, MPL, or CALR mutations were studied from August 2017 to October 2022.
  • Patients were divided into groups by mutation status (with or without atypical driver mutations) and assessed according to MPN subtype diagnosis: essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), or overt primary myelofibrosis (overt-PMF).

Key findings1

  • Overall, 359 patient cases were included.
  • Of these, 55 patients (15%) expressed atypical variants of driver genes (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Patients with and without atypical driver mutations, by MPN subtype* 

ET, essential thrombocytopenia, MPN, myeloproliferative neoplasms; PMF, primary myelofibrosis, PV, polycythemia vera.
*Adapted from Wang et al.1

  • Of the 85% of patients without atypical variants of driver genes, incidence of classical driver mutations were:
    • 81% with JAK2;
    • 16% with CALR;
    • 3% with MPL.
  • In total, 30 atypical variants of JAK2, MPL, and CALR were reported and 51% were male.
  • The median age was 64 years.
    • Patients with ET and atypical variants tended to be older than patients without atypical variants (70 years vs 61 years).
  • The incidence of MPL mutations was higher in patients with ET who have atypical variants of driver genes vs without, but similar between other Ph-negative subgroups (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Driver classical gene mutations present in patients with MPN A with atypical variants of driver genes vs B without atypical variants*

ET, essential thrombocythemia; PMF, primary myelofibrosis; PV, polycythemia vera.
*Adapted from Wang et al.1

Key learnings 

  • Within a study population of 359 patients with MPN, 15% had atypical variants of JAK2, MPL, or CALR.
  • Overall, 30 different atypical variants of JAK2, MPL, and CALR were identified, and atypical JAK2 variants were more common than atypical variants of MPL and CALR.
  • Future studies should aim to further explore the roles of atypical variant mutations in genetic pathways underlying MPN, and their implications for prognosis and treatment.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

More about...

Your opinion matters

On average, how many patients with myelofibrosis do you see in a month?