All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.

The MPN Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your MPN Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

2020-09-22T08:44:39.000Z

Coupling germline genetics to interferon-alpha responses in polycythemia vera treatment

Sep 22, 2020
Share:

Bookmark this article

Pegylated interferon alfa-2 (PEG-IFN) induces high response rates in many patients with polycythemia vera (PV), while some patients do not respond well. In order to identify specific genetic predictors, a new study by Jaeger and colleagues in Blood investigated specific germline diplotypes of the interferon lambda 4 (IFNL4) gene locus and their correlation with PEG-IFN treatment outcome.1

Methods

Samples from 122 patients treated with PEG-IFN in the PROUD-PV and CONTINUATION-PV trials were used for the primary analysis, while samples from 27 patients treated in the PEGINVERA trial (NCT01193699) were used to replicate results.1,2 The samples were analyzed with Affymetrix SNP 6.0 microarrays at 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months of follow-up. IFNL4 variants were sequenced and phased with SHAPEIT.3

Results

Using a genome-wide association study analysis tagging single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and correlating allelic differences with hematologic response (HR) or molecular response (MR) in PEG-IFN-treated patients did not reveal any significant genome-wide associations. However, in a hypothesis-driven approach investigating the role of the IFNL4 gene locus variants, the authors demonstrated a significant genomic correlation between non-functional IFNL4 variants and improved MR (not HR).

The IFNL4 gene is a polymorphic pseudogene, which translates into the functional IFNL4 protein only in some humans. The gene is polymorphic in humans, and the TT allele for the variants rs368234815 and rs8099917 produces a frameshift in the coding region leading to a non-coding mRNA. Similarly, for the rs12979860 variant, a CC allele leads to lack of IFNL4 expression. In contrast, the rs117648444 variant can come with a G allele leading to the expression of an impaired IFNL4-S70 protein, while the non-G allele produces the fully functional IFNL4-P70 protein. Interestingly, non-coding IFNL4 SNPs (rs12979860, rs8099917) have previously shown to be associated with response to PEG-IFN and viral clearance during hepatitis C virus infection.

In accordance with results for hepatitis C virus treatment, the investigated PV population showed a significant genotypic association of the non-coding alleles of rs368234815 (OR, 6.10; 95% CI, 1.49–36.64; p = 0.00065), rs8099917 (OR, 4.60; 95% CI, 1.39–16.69; p = 0.0071), and rs12979860 (OR, 6.10; 95% CI, 1.49–36.64; p = 0.0065) for MR at 36 months follow-up.

Based on that finding, the authors investigated diplotypes of these variants in patients, which comprises three functional classes: no IFNL4, nonfunctional IFNL4-S70, and active IFNL4-P70. As was expected, MR (but not HR) was strongly associated with the absence of IFNL4 (89.3%) versus a completely functional IFNL4-P70 (43.3%) protein. Interestingly, the impaired IFNL4-S70 induced similar responses to no IFNL4 (Table 1)

Table 1. Influence of IFNL4 diplotypes on the molecular response in PEG-IFN treatment of PV1

CI, confidence interval; IFNL4, interferon lambda 4; n, number of patients; NR, non-responders; N (no IFNL4); OR, odds ratio; P, IFNL4-P70; R, responders; S, IFNL4-S70.

Variant/
diplotype

Diploid
status

n

NR, n

R, n

R, %

OR, 95% CI

P value

Contribution of IFNL4-S70 and no-IFNL4 compared with IFNL4-P70 alone

IFNL4-P70 alone

P/N and P/P

26

15

11

42.3

Reference

 

IFNL4-S70 and S70/P70

N/S and P/S

15

3

12

80.0

5.23, 1.0635.87

0.0254

no IFNL4

N/N

28

3

25

89.3

10.80, 2.3969.97

0.000391

Contribution of IFNL4-S70 compared with no-IFNL4

no IFNL4

N/N

28

3

25

89.3

Reference

 

IFNL4-S70 and S70/P70

N/S and

P/S

15

3

12

80.0

0.49, 0.064.20

0.6474

These results were confirmed in 27 patients treated in the PEGINVERA trial, where a consistent trend for a better MR after PEG-IFN treatment was observed in patients lacking functional IFNL4 at 24 months follow-up (p = 0.068).

Conclusions

In patients with PV treated with PEG-IFN, lack of functional IFNL4 expression status confers a significantly better MR indicating deeper responses which the potential for cure. In contrast, no differences were observed for HR. These data may have implications for optimizing patient management during PEG-IFN treatment, warranting further confirmation in bigger patient cohorts.

  1. Gisslinger H, Klade C, Georgiev P, et al. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b versus standard therapy for polycythaemia vera (PROUD-PV and CONTINUATION-PV): a randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial and its extension study. Lancet Haematol. 2020;7(3):e196-e208. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30236-4

  2. Gisslinger H, Zagrijtschuk O, Buxhofer-Ausch V, et al. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b, a novel IFNalpha-2b, induces high response rates with low toxicity in patients with polycythemia vera. Blood. 2015;126(15):1762-1769. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-04-637280

  3. Delaneau O, Zagury JF, Marchini J. Improved whole-chromosome phasing for disease and population genetic studies. Nat Methods. 2013;10(1):5–6. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2307

Your opinion matters

What do you consider to be the highest unmet need for patients with myelofibrosis?​
9 votes - 3 days left ...

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to MPN delivered to your inbox