TRANSLATE

The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Genetic factors are more important than disease activity for transplantation outcomes in patients with MPN-BP

Dec 18, 2020


Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) in the blast phase (BP) are defined as ≥ 20% myeloblasts in the peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM)—this is seen in around 5–20% of patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative MPN. The outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in these patients are still not fully understood.

In this retrospective study, Vikas Gupta and colleagues investigated molecular, cytogenetic, and clinical factors in patients with MPN-BP and their association with outcome post allogeneic HCT.1 Their results have been recently published in Blood Advances and are summarized here.

Study design

177 patients with MPN-BP were identified from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database. Next-generation sequencing was possible in only 95 patients (54%), using a panel of 49 genes clinically relevant in hematologic malignancies.

The patients were also analyzed for the following endpoints:

  • Overall survival (OS): time from HCT to death from any cause
  • Relapse
  • Non-relapse mortality (NRM)
  • Progression-free survival (PFS)

Patient characteristics

DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; ET, essential thrombocythemia; HCT, hematopoietic cell transplantation; MPN, myeloproliferative neoplasms; PMF, primary myelofibrosis; PV, primary myelofibrosis.

 

Sample DNA obtained
(n = 95)

No sample DNA obtained
(n = 82)

Total
 
(n = 177)

Median age at HCT, years (range)

59.9
(41.05–81.55)

58.48
(40.29–74.04)

58.75
(40.29–81.55)

Female sex, %

32.6

36.6

34.5

Karnofsky index < 90%, %

49.5

45.1

47.5

Type of MPN at diagnosis, %
     ET
     PV
     PMF
     MPN, unclassifiable

  
26.3
27.4
33.7
12.6

  
31.7
24.4
34.1
9.8

  
28.8
26
33.9
11.3

Cytogenetics, %
     Favorable
     Intermediate
     Poor risk
     Not tested
     Missing

  
1.1
52.6
41.1
2.1
3.2

  
0
56.1
34.1
3.7
6.1

  
0.6
54.2
37.9
2.8
4.5

Graft source, %
     Bone marrow
     Peripheral blood

  
14.7
85.3

  
9.8
90.2

  
12.4
87.6

Donor type, %
     Matched sibling donor
     Other related donor
     Matched unrelated donor
     Mismatched unrelated donor

  
7.4
3.2
69.5
20

  
57.3
12.2
20.7
9.8

  
30.5
7.3
46.9
15.3

Results

  • 43% of patients in both cohorts had active leukemia at the time of HCT.
  • The median follow-up of survivors was 71 months (range, 14-169).

Poor-risk cytogenetics and stem cell source impact on transplant outcome

  • In the entire cohort, the 5-year OS rate was 18%, with a cumulative incidence of relapse of 61% and NRM of 25%.
  • Across the study, 38% of patients had poor-risk cytogenetics, compared with 41% in the cohort of patients with molecular samples.
  • Multivariate analysis confirmed that poor-risk cytogenetics was correlated with inferior OS (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.21–2.41), inferior PFS (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.27–2.50), and a higher relapse rate (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.32–2.82).
  • When patients underwent HCT using PB progenitor cells, they had improved OS due to lower NRM (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 012–0.62).
  • No difference in OS or relapse was noted between MPN-BP patients with PB/BM blasts < 5% at the time of HCT and those with active leukemia.

Analyzing molecular data in patients with MPN-BP

  • In total, 91 patients (96%) had mutations in one or more genes (one mutation in 21%, 2–3 mutations in 43%, and ≥ 4 mutations in 32%).
  • The most frequently mutated genes in the study cohort were: JAK2 (55%), TP53 (23%), ASXL1 (22%), TET2 (19%), SRSF2 (16%), DNMT3A (14%), RUNX1 (14%), CALR (13%), and SF3B1 (11%).
  • In these patients, the OS after 5 years was 16% while PFS 11%, with an incidence of relapse of 66% and NRM of 23%.

TP53 mutations impact strongly on outcome

  • Mutations in the TP53 gene were the most frequent after JAK2 mutation and the only mutation that independently impacted on transplant outcomes.
  • There were 27 different TP53 mutations identified in the 22 affected patients; most of them (89%) were missense alterations in the TP53 DNA-binding domain. TP53 variant allele frequency was 18.6 (range, 2.1–91.7) and 67% of these patients had poor risk cytogenetics.
  • The 3-year OS and cumulative incidence of relapse of patients with mutated vs unmutated TP53 were 4% vs 33% (p < 0.001) and 91% vs 58% (p < 0.001), respectively.

Key findings

  • Genetic factors, namely poor risk cytogenetics and TP53 mutation status, predict inferior outcomes of HCT in patients with MPN-BP. The authors conclude that no meaningful benefit of HCT was observed in patients with MPN-BP when mutated TP53 was detected.
  • There was no difference in transplant outcomes for patients undergoing transplantation with PB/BM blasts < 5% compared those with active leukemia.
  • Relapse after HCT is frequent in patients with MPN-BP. Half of the patients in this study relapsed within 1 year of HCT, and this proportion was even higher in individuals with poor-risk cytogenetics or mutated TP53.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content