The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View mpn content recommended for you
Myelofibrosis (MF) is characterized by abnormal megakaryopoiesis and overproduction of proinflammatory cytokines, which lead to bone marrow fibrosis, progressive anemia, and extramedullary hematopoiesis resulting in hepatosplenomegaly. Bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) proteins are involved in regulating neoplastic myeloproliferation and proinflammatory cytokine expression mediated by nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB). Therefore, BET proteins are an attractive target for drug development in MF.
Pelabresib is a potent and selective BET bromodomain inhibitor currently under investigation for the treatment of MF. The MPN Hub has previously reported on the phase II MANIFEST clinical trial (NCT02158858) of pelabresib in MF. At the 26th Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA2021), Patricia Keller and colleagues, presented the interim translational data from the MANIFEST trial.1 The results are summarized below.
Phase II, open-label clinical trial of pelabresib as monotherapy, or in combination with ruxolitinib. The study had three arms, broken down into five cohorts depending on transfusion dependence (Table 1), with different clinical endpoints for each cohort.
Table 1. MANIFEST trial design*
JAKi, JAK inhibitor; TD, transfusion dependent; TI, transfusion independent. |
|||
Arm |
Eligibility |
Treatment |
Cohort |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
Prior treatment with ruxolitinib, but patients are refractory/intolerant/ineligible |
Pelabresib |
1A: TD |
2 |
Current treatment with ruxolitinib but with suboptimal response or MF progression |
Pelabresib with ruxolitinib |
2A: TD |
3 |
JAKi naïve |
Pelabresib with ruxolitinib |
JAKi-naïve |
The clinical endpoints for each cohort were as follows:
The pharmacodynamic (PD) activity of pelabresib was assessed including changes in inflammatory cytokines in the blood, improvement of bone marrow biology including bone marrow fibrosis (BMF), and impact of mutation status on clinical response:
Table 2. Improvement in BM erythroid progenitors and megakaryocyte numbers and clustering*
Eryth, erythroid progenitors; MK, megakaryocyte. |
||||
Cell population |
Arm 1 |
Arm 2 |
Arm 3 |
Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
Eryth (CD71+), % |
38 |
65 |
67 |
59 |
MK (CD61+), % |
38 |
59 |
92 |
65 |
The interim translational data from the MANIFEST study demonstrate a robust PD effect of pelabresib in patients with MF. Pelabresib monotherapy, and in combination with ruxolitinib, impacted both cytokine expression and bone marrow function and showed broad clinical activity regardless of mutational status. MANIFEST-2 (NCT04603495) is a global, randomized, double-blind phase III trial that is currently underway to evaluate the combination of pelabresib with ruxolitinib versus placebo with ruxolitinib in JAKi-naïve patients with MF.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content