All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.

  TRANSLATE

The MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by GSK, Novartis, Sobi and Takeda and supported through independent educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Blueprint Medicines, Incyte and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, Rahway, NJ, USA. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Phase IIa IMPRSSION trial: Sapablursen in phlebotomy-dependent PV

By Amy Hopkins

Share:

Oct 9, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in polycythemia vera.


Results from the ongoing phase IIa, randomized, open-label IMPRSSION (NCT05143957) study evaluating sapablursen, an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) targeting transmembrane serine protease 6 (TMPRSS6), added to standard of care (SoC) in 49 patients with phlebotomy-dependent polycythemia vera (PV) were published in Blood by Palmer et al. Phlebotomy dependence was defined as patients who had ≥3 phlebotomies in the preceding 6 months and ≥1 phlebotomy within the last 12 weeks. Patients in Cohort A received sapablursen 120 mg to Week 13, before switching to 80 mg through Week 37. Patients in Cohort B received sapablursen 40 mg throughout. The primary efficacy endpoint was the reduction from baseline in the number of phlebotomies per week between Weeks 17 and 37.

Key data: The estimated mean number of phlebotomies per year was reduced from 7.8 to 2.6 and from 8.8 to 3.6 in Cohorts A and B, respectively. The mean weekly phlebotomy rate was significantly reduced from baseline in both Cohort A (–0.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], –0.13 to –0.07; p < 0.0001) and B (–0.10; 95% CI, –0.14 to –0.06; p = 0.0001). Overall, 53% of patients in Cohort A and 41% of patients in Cohort B had a >90% reduction in phlebotomy rate. Mean hematocrit values were reduced from 46.4% at baseline to 41.5% at Week 17 and 40.5% at Week 37 in Cohort A, and from 45.5% to 42.9% and 43.5%, respectively, in Cohort B. The Myeloproliferative Neoplasm-Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score (MPN-SAF-TSS) significantly improved from baseline to Week 37 in Cohort A (mean change from baseline [CFB], −6.21; p = 0.0052), but not Cohort B (mean CFB, −2.71; p = 0.34). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 97% of patients in Cohort A and 82% in Cohort B; most TEAEs were mild (75%) or moderate (22%) in severity. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in 18% of patients. 

Key learning: In the IMPRSSION trial, sapablursen significantly reduced phlebotomy requirements and improved symptoms in patients with phlebotomy-dependent PV, supporting 80 mg as an appropriate starting dose. Sapablursen will be further evaluated in the planned placebo-controlled phase III INTREPID study (NCT07429266).

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content