TRANSLATE

The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Phase III VERIFY trial of rusfertide in patients with PV: Positive topline results announced

By Dylan Barrett

Share:

Mar 5, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in polycythemia vera.


Positive topline results have been announced from the ongoing, global, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III VERIFY trial (NCT05210790).1 This trial assessed the efficacy and safety of once-weekly, subcutaneously self-administered rusfertide, an investigational hepcidin mimetic peptide therapy, vs placebo in 293 phlebotomy-dependent patients with polycythemia vera (PV).1 The MPN Hub previously reported results from the phase II REVIVE trial of rusfertide in patients with PV.

The VERIFY trial primary endpoint was met, with a higher proportion of patients treated with rusfertide achieving a clinical response (defined as the absence of phlebotomy eligibility, during Weeks 20–32) vs placebo (77% vs 33%; p < 0.0001).1

All four key secondary endpoints were also met, including mean number of phlebotomies during Weeks 0–32 (0.5 vs 1.8; p < 0.0001), hematocrit control, and patient-reported outcomes using Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue SF-8a and Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score (MFSAF-TSS)-7.1 The safety profile of rusfertide was consistent with previous reports.1

These results highlight the potential for rusfertide as a first-in-class erythrocytosis-specific agent to address unmet treatment needs in patients with PV who are unable to achieve adequate hematocrit control with currently approved treatments.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

On average, how many patients with myelofibrosis do you see in a month?