All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your MPN Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Positive topline results have been announced from the ongoing, global, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III VERIFY trial (NCT05210790).1 This trial assessed the efficacy and safety of once-weekly, subcutaneously self-administered rusfertide, an investigational hepcidin mimetic peptide therapy, vs placebo in 293 phlebotomy-dependent patients with polycythemia vera (PV).1 The MPN Hub previously reported results from the phase II REVIVE trial of rusfertide in patients with PV.
The VERIFY trial primary endpoint was met, with a higher proportion of patients treated with rusfertide achieving a clinical response (defined as the absence of phlebotomy eligibility, during Weeks 20–32) vs placebo (77% vs 33%; p < 0.0001).1
All four key secondary endpoints were also met, including mean number of phlebotomies during Weeks 0–32 (0.5 vs 1.8; p < 0.0001), hematocrit control, and patient-reported outcomes using Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue SF-8a and Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score (MFSAF-TSS)-7.1 The safety profile of rusfertide was consistent with previous reports.1
These results highlight the potential for rusfertide as a first-in-class erythrocytosis-specific agent to address unmet treatment needs in patients with PV who are unable to achieve adequate hematocrit control with currently approved treatments.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to MPN delivered to your inbox