All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.
The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health, GSK, Sumitomo Pharma, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and Incyte. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View MPN content recommended for you
Results from a recent study, assessing the interest in and use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in patients with BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN; N = 166), were published in the Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology by Crodel et al. Patient-level data were collected through the use of a patient-reported questionnaire.
Key data: Overall, 51.8% of patients reported using CAM, with higher usage among females (59.6%) compared with males (41.7%; p = 0.022). Types of CAM included dietary regimens, vitamin and mineral supplements, acupuncture, yoga/Tai Chi/Qi Gong, prayer, homeopathy, and mistletoe. Patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) reported a higher use of CAM vs patients with myelofibrosis (MF; 65.2% vs 37.2%; p = 0.002); 55% of patients with polycythemia vera (PV) used CAM. Among 153 respondents, 45.1% expressed an interest in CAM, 43.5% of whom developed an interest following diagnosis; 28.8% reported no interest in CAM and 26.1% were uncertain. Some CAM (such as apricot kernels / amygdalin and St. John’s wort) poses potential risks, including toxicity, malnutrition, and clinically relevant drug interactions.
Key learning: Interest in and usage of CAM is common in patients with BCR::ABL1-negative MPN; healthcare providers should proactively discuss CAM with patients to ensure safe integration with conventional treatments.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content