TRANSLATE

The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

REVEAL trial | Updates from the EHA 2022 Congress

By Dylan Barrett

Share:

Aug 4, 2022

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to describe associations between blood counts and thrombotic risk in patients with PV


Test your knowledge! Take our quick quiz before and after you read this article to find out if you improved your knowledge. Results help us to improve content and continually provide open-access education.

Question 1 of 2

Which of the following factors are included in the conventional risk model to determine thrombotic risk?

A

B

C

D

Polycythemia vera (PV) is a myeloproliferative neoplasia characterized by clonal hematopoiesis, resulting in elevated peripheral blood counts and increased likelihood of thrombotic events (TEs).1 The conventional risk model uses age and TE history to determine the TE risk and treatment strategy. While the connection between increased risk of TE and elevated hematocrit (HCT) levels has been established, the association between TEs and white blood cell (WBC) or platelet (PLT) counts has not been consistently assessed.1

A prospective observational study of patients with PV in the US clinical practices, entitled REVEAL study (NCT02252159), is currently evaluating patients with PV treated in community or academic centers in the real-world settings. During the European Hematology Association (EHA) 2022 Congress, Gerds, et al.1 reported an evaluation of the association between elevated blood counts and the occurrence of TEs, based on data from the REVEAL study. We summarize the key points below.

Study design

REVEAL is a multicenter, non-interventional, prospective, observational study. Key inclusion criteria are as follows:

  • ≥18 years old.
  • Clinical diagnosis of PV.
  • Under supervision by the healthcare professional for management of PV.

Patients included in this analysis had ≥3 blood counts in the post-enrollment period. Patients were excluded if they had a post-enrollment TE but did not have a blood count value <6 months before that TE. The main thresholds used in the analysis for blood counts were as follows:

  • HCT >45%
  • WBC count >11 × 109/L
  • PLT count >400 × 109/L

Alternative thresholds were also investigated:

  • WBC count: <7 × 109/L, ≥7 to <8.5 × 109/L, ≥8.5 to <11 × 109/L, and ≥11 × 109/L
  • PLT count: >600 × 109/L

A separate analysis of the association between elevated WBC count and TEs at HCT ≤45% was conducted to evaluate whether the risk could be reduced by controlling the WBC count alone.

Results

Of the 2,510 patients enrolled, 2,271 were included in the analysis. The patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. About 20% of patients had a TE history, and ~60% of patients were on cytoreductive therapy (hydroxyurea, 52.6%).

Table 1. Patient characteristics*

HCT, hematocrit; PLT, platelet; WBC, white blood cell.
*Adapted from Gerds, et al.1
Risk status was assessed based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines.
Other treatments: ruxolitinib (4.4%), anagrelide (2.2%), interferon (1.5%), busulfan (0.2%), chlorambucil (0%).

Characteristic

Patients (N = 2,271)

Median age, years (range)

67 (22–95)

Male, %

54.1

Median disease duration, years (range)

4.1 (0–56.3)

History of thrombosis, %

20.1

Risk status, %

              Low

22.1

              High

77.9

Cytoreductive therapy, %

              None

40.5

              Hydroxyurea

52.6

              Other

8.0

HCT level, %

              ≤45%

52.5

              >45%

47.5

WBC count, %

              ≤11 × 109/L

69.2

              >11 × 109/L

30.8

PLT count, %

              ≤400 × 109/L

63.7

              >400 × 109/L

36.3

After enrollment, 106 patients had any TE: arterial TEs occurred in 30 patients, mostly transient ischemic attack (0.7%); and venous TEs were recorded in 76 patients, mostly deep vein thrombosis (1.6%).

  • Among those with a TE history at enrollment, 38 patients (8.3%) had a TE during the follow-up, including 10 arterial TE events, and 28 venous TE events.

Association between blood count and TEs

Table 2 shows the covariates associated with TE risk. As expected, age, male sex, and history of TEs were significant. Elevated HCT, WBC count, and PLT count were also significantly associated with TE risk. The significance was less for WBC count.

Table 2. Association between blood count and TE (main threshold)*

CI, confidence interval; HCT, hematocrit; HR, hazard ratio; HU, hydroxyurea; PLT, platelet; TE, thrombotic event; WBC, white blood cell.
*Adapted from Gerds, et al.1

Analysis

HR (95% CI)

p value

Association between elevated HCT and TEs

              Age, years

1.03 (1.010–1.046)

0.0026

              Male sex (male vs female)

0.54 (0.362–0.799)

0.0021

              History of TE (yes vs no)

2.49 (1.667–3.717)

<0.0001

              HCT (>45% vs ≤45%)

1.84 (1.234–2.749)

0.0028

Association between elevated WBC count and TEs

              Age, years

1.02 (1.007–1.042)

0.0068

              Male sex (male vs female)

0.58 (0.393–0.858)

0.0063

              History of TE (yes vs no)

2.42 (1.623–3.619)

<0.0001

              WBC count (>11 × 109/L vs ≤11 × 109/L)

2.35 (1.598–3.465)

<0.0001

Association between elevated PLT count (>400 × 109/L) and TEs

              Age, years

1.03 (1.010–1.046)

0.0022

              Male sex (male vs female)

0.62 (0.416–0.914)

0.0162

              History of TE (yes vs no)

2.45 (1.640–3.654)

<0.0001

              PLT count (>400 × 109/L vs ≤400 × 109/L)

1.60 (1.088–2.359)

0.0170

In terms of alternative thresholds, for WBC count, only the ≥11 × 109/L versus <7 × 109/L threshold was significantly associated with increased TE risk. There was no significant association between PLT count >600 × 109/L and TE risk.

When the HCT was controlled at ≤45%, an elevated WBC count (>12 × 109/L) was significantly associated with increased risk of TE (hazard ratio, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.066–3.554; p = 0.03).

Conclusion

This analysis of the REVEAL study has shown statistically significant associations between elevated HCT levels, elevated WBC count, and elevated PTC count and increased TE risk in patients with PV. A WBC count of >12 is significantly associated with increased TE risk when the HCT is controlled, which suggests that TE risk may be reduced by controlling the WBC count and HCT level. This analysis supports the incorporation of blood cell counts into risk assessments and treatment plans for patients with PV. The causal relationship between blood counts and TEs needs to be explored further.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

On average, how many patients with myelofibrosis do you see in a month?