All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.
The MPN Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your MPN Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
Twice-daily vs once-daily low-dose aspirin for ET: Results from the ARES trial
|
The phase II ARES trial (EudraCT 2016–002885-30) assessed the long-term pharmacodynamic superiority and safety of a twice-daily 100 mg aspirin regimen vs the standard once-daily regimen in 242 adult patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET).1 Results from this trial were published in the American Journal of Hematology by Rocca et al.1
|
| Key learnings1 |
| The primary endpoint was met; during a 20-month follow-up, patients who were treated with the twice-daily low-dose aspirin regimen showed significantly lower levels of serum thromboxane B2 compared with once-daily dosing (median, 3.9 vs 19.2 ng/ml; p < 0.001), suggesting enhanced antithrombotic efficacy. |
| Twice-daily low-dose aspirin dosing was associated with a reduction in disease-specific symptoms vs standard once-daily dosing (no reported symptoms, 17.3% vs 14.3%; p < 0.05; ≥8 reported symptoms; 7.9% vs 13.0%; p = 0.0001) and significant relief from severe hand and foot microvascular pain, without an increase in upper gastrointestinal discomfort. |
| Bleeding risks were similar between the twice-daily and once-daily aspirin regimens, although there was a trend towards more clinically relevant non-major bleeding in the twice-daily group (8 vs 2). |
| This study supports consideration of twice-daily low-dose aspirin as a well-tolerated and potentially more effective option for managing patients with ET, particularly in those with high symptom burden and risk of thrombotic events. |
- Rocca B, Tosetto A, Petrucci G, et al. Long-term pharmacodynamic and clinical effects of twice- versus once-daily low-dose aspirin in essential thrombocythemia: The ARES trial. Am J Hematol. 2024;99(8):1462-1474. DOI: 1002/ajh.27418
Your opinion matters
4 votes - 20 days left ...
Newsletter
Subscribe to get the best content related to MPN delivered to your inbox