All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your MPN Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are associated with a high symptom burden and the risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Treatment options for MPN have progressed significantly in recent years, with JAK inhibitors, for example, offering effective treatment for patients with MPN. However, from the patient perspective, the burden of disease and the need for additional symptom management strategies remains high.
Integrative medicine (IM) describes a targeted, holistic, and supportive patient-centered approach to treatment, alongside pharmacological and clinical treatments. Existing evidence indicates that cancer patients may use complementary treatments without consulting their treating physicians. There is limited evidence and a lack of awareness surrounding meaningful benefits of certain IM approaches. Here we summarize the work of Krisstina Gowin et al, published in Cancer Medicine in July 2020, describing the benefit of different IM treatments on symptom relief and quality of life (QoL) in patients with MPN.1
Figure 1. Integrative modalities used in > 5% of patients1
Table 1. Relative scores of participants engaged in IM practices relative to those not1
BFI, brief fatigue inventory; MPN-SAF TSS, Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score; QoL, quality of life. |
||||
Intervention/Tool |
Score of users |
Score of non-users |
P value |
Modality use vs control |
---|---|---|---|---|
MPN symptom burden (MPN-SAF TSS) |
||||
Aerobic activity |
33.2 |
39.7 |
< 0.001 |
better |
Strength training |
34.0 |
37.7 |
0.013 |
better |
Massage therapy |
40.5 |
25.2 |
< 0.001 |
worse |
Support groups |
42.3 |
36.0 |
< 0.001 |
worse |
Omega 3 |
24.4 |
27.8 |
0.03 |
better |
QoL |
||||
Aerobic activity |
4.2 |
5.2 |
< 0.001 |
worse |
Strength training |
4.2 |
4.9 |
0.001 |
worse |
Massage therapy |
5.0 |
4.6 |
0.04 |
better |
Support groups |
5.4 |
4.6 |
0.002 |
better |
Omega 3 |
3.4 |
3.7 |
0.18 |
no difference |
Fatigue (BFI) |
||||
Aerobic activity |
5.1 |
5.9 |
< 0.001 |
better |
Strength training |
5.2 |
5.7 |
0.03 |
better |
Massage therapy |
6.1 |
5.4 |
< 0.001 |
worse |
Breathing techniques |
6.1 |
5.5 |
0.02 |
worse |
Omega 3 |
4.1 |
4.6 |
0.02 |
better |
The study correctly identifies that symptom management, complementary treatment of the disease, and quality of life represent unmet needs of patients with MPN. IM modalities have a clear role in the management of patient symptoms but may have differential roles for the relief of specific symptoms, with an association seen for aerobic exercise and strength training and improved symptom, fatigue, and depression scores, while massage and support groups seemed to correlate with better quality of life. The role of omega 3 for symptoms and fatigue control is intriguing and may need further research. The fact that many patients reported a high degree of feeling unheard may point to a need for better training of treating physicians in IM-related aspects. Furthermore, the study identifies that only a small proportion of patients receive specific counselling and guidance in the areas studied and suggests that the universal application of IM strategies to all patients with MPN would be of benefit.
Limitations of the study include a female gender bias, the known considerations of surveys that utilize self-reporting, and the focus of the study on established and prevalent IM modalities, not those that may be accessed less frequently.
The main conclusion of the study is that further, interventional clinical research is needed to establish if IM modalities can improve the QoL and symptoms patients with MPN.
The SIMM study shows the tremendous amount of interest that exists amongst MPN patients for self driven ways to improve their quality of life, improve MPN symptoms, and perhaps impact the disease. As my co-investigators and I have found there is great enthusiasm for participating in well organized clinical trials of complementary interventions such as exercise, yoga, meditation, and nutritional interventions. We hope to evolve to bring real evidence on the benefit of these interventions and how to integrate them with evolving medical therapies.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to MPN delivered to your inbox