The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View mpn content recommended for you
Featured:
The MPN Hub was pleased to speak to Laura Michaelis, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, US and Anand Patel, University of Chicago, Chicago, US. We asked, When to refer patients with MPN to clinical trials: Part I — Patients with essential thrombocytopenia/polycythemia vera.
When to refer patients with MPN to clinical trials: Part I - Patients with ET/PV
In this podcast, Michaelis and Patel discuss the factors which determine whether standard of care treatment or referral to a clinical trial is the most appropriate course of action. Patel begins by outlining drugs currently under clinical trial for essential thrombocytopenia and polycythemia vera. Michaelis and Patel then consider the importance of aligning trial endpoints with the individualized treatment goals of patients. They conclude by discussing how the progression of a patient to second-line therapy, as well as cytogenetic abnormalities that indicate more aggressive disease progression, may underly the decision to consider clinical trials that align with a patient’s goals.
Your opinion matters
On average, how many patients with myelofibrosis do you see in a month?