All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.

The MPN Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your MPN Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

2024-02-16T12:18:35.000Z

Blast reduction strategies for patients with accelerated/blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasms

Feb 16, 2024
Share:
Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Bookmark this article

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the only therapy that offers long term survival for accelerated-phase (AC) and blast-phase (BP) myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Currently, the use of acute myeloid leukemia based intensive/non-intensive blast reduction regimens and management considerations in patients with AC and BP is not well understood.

Recently, Davidson et al.1 published a retrospective study in Blood Advances to evaluate the clinical outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia based blast reduction strategies in patients with AC/BP MPN. We summarize the key points below.

Study design1

  • In total, 138 patients were enrolled and given either:
    • Intensive therapies (n = 81): daunorubicin, high-dose cytarabine, fludarabine, idarubicin, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, mitoxantrone, and etoposide + cytarabine
    • Non-intensive therapies (n = 57): hypomethylating agent monotherapy (HMA), azacitidine, decitabine, and venetoclax
  • Primary endpoint was overall best response, measured as complete remission/complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery or chronic phase MPN
  • Patients were assessed for a median follow-up of 40.3 months

Key findings1

  • The overall best response rate was 77% for intensive and 39% for non-intensive regimens.
  • More patients responded after HMA plus azacitadine and venetoclax treatment vs HMA alone (50% vs 33%, respectively).
  • There were no statistically significant differences in median time to allo-HSCT in intensive vs non-intensive and type of regimen.
  • The percentage of patients who achieved eligibility for allo-HSCT for each treatment regimen are provided in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Percentage of patients who achieved eligibility for allo-HSCT for each treatment regimen*

Allo-HSCT, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; Ara-C, cytarabine; Aza, azacitidine; HD, high-dose; HMA, hypomethylating agent; Ven, venetoclax.
*Adapted from Davidson et al.1

  • Mutational burden remained high despite blast reduction posttreatment.
  • No clear association between molecular response and treatment response.
  • Full mutational clearance was only observed in patients who underwent successful allo-HSCT.

Key learnings

  • Both intensive and non-intensive regimens can be used as a bridge to allo-HSCT in selected patients.
  • Responses to blast reduction strategies often entail a reversion to chronic phase MPN.
  • Both blast-reduction strategies have limited disease modifying activity and allo-HSCT is therefore required for long-term disease control.

  1. Davidson M, Kennedy J, Capo-Chichi JM, et al. Outcomes of intensive and non-intensive blast-reduction strategies in accelerated and blast-phase MPN. Blood Adv. 2024. Published online ahead of print. DOI: 1182/bloodadvances.2023011735

Your opinion matters

What do you consider to be the highest unmet need for patients with myelofibrosis?​
2 votes - 19 days left ...

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to MPN delivered to your inbox