All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.

  TRANSLATE

The MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by GSK, Novartis, AOP, Sobi and Takeda and supported through independent educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Blueprint Medicines, Incyte and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, Rahway, NJ, USA. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Bomedemstat in essential thrombocythemia: Phase II study

By Amy Hopkins

Share:

Sep 1, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in essential thrombocythemia.


Results from an open-label, single-arm, phase II trial (NCT04254978) evaluating bomedemstat in 73 patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) who had an inadequate response to or were intolerant of ≥1 standard therapy were published in Blood Advances by Gill et al. The primary endpoints were safety and response, defined as a reduction in platelet count to ≤400 × 109/L without new thromboembolic events. 

Key data: At Week 24, 77% of evaluable patients achieved a response (n = 64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 64.3–86.2; p < 0.0001), with a median time to first response of 71 days. During the overall treatment period, 10% of patients achieved a complete response (CR), while 68% of patients achieved a partial response (PR). A durable reduction in platelet and white blood cell counts was observed in 72% and 85% of patients, respectively. During the overall treatment period, 5% of patients experienced ≥1 thrombotic event and 32% experienced ≥1 hemorrhagic event. A decrease in variant allele frequency (VAF) of CALR, JAK2, or MPL was observed in 85% of evaluable patients (n = 46). Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) occurred in 47% and 37% of patients, respectively. 

Key learning: Bomedemstat demonstrated clinically relevant hematologic activity in patients with ET; however, the single-arm design and limited follow-up preclude definitive conclusions, and randomized trials are warranted. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

Do you include basal serum tryptase (bST) testing in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with MPN?