All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your MPN Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Currently, ruxolitinib is used for the treatment of patients diagnosed with intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis.1 Results from the phase III COMFORT trials have shown ruxolitinib to reduce spleen volume, improve disease-related symptoms, and prolong overall survival. The COMFORT-I trial compared ruxolitinib therapy with placebo and the COMFORT-II trial compared ruxolitinib with best available treatment.1
During the European Hematology Association (EHA) 2023 Congress, post hoc analysis results investigating the impact of new or worsening anemia on spleen volume response and total symptom score (TSS) in patients diagnosed with myelofibrosis and treated with ruxolitinib were published.1 We summarize the key findings below.
Figure 1. Percentage of patients achieving SVR35 with new or worsening anemia according to anemia status and transfusion dependence*
NTD, non-transfusion dependent; TD, transfusion dependent; SVR35, spleen volume reduction of ≥35%.
*Adapted from Mauro.1
Figure 2. Percentage of patients achieving SVR35 with no new or worsening anemia according to anemia status and transfusion dependence*
NTD, non-transfusion dependent; TD, transfusion dependent.
*Adapted from Mauro.1
Patients treated with ruxolitinib experienced decreased spleen volume and improved TSS regardless of anemia and transfusion dependence status. Furthermore, new or worsening anemia after baseline had no effect on the efficacy of ruxolitinib compared with patients who experienced no new or worsening anemia.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to MPN delivered to your inbox