All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.

  TRANSLATE

The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb and Incyte. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Defining disease progression in PV: A US modified Delphi consensus

By Devon Else

Share:

Nov 18, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in polycythemia vera.


Results from a US modified Delphi consensus to define disease progression and disease modification in polycythemia vera (PV) were recently published in Annals of Hematology by Bose et al. A steering group of seven US-based physicians generated 41 consensus statements across six domains, which were tested with 61 hematology and/or oncology specialists.

Key data: Consensus was achieved for 95% of statements. Highest consensus was observed for “Treatment consensus should be individualized”, “Comorbidity risk should be assessed prior to treatment selection”, and “Disease progression can be represented by a patient progressing with circulating blasts or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or post-PV myelofibrosis [MF]” (each 93%). Key treatment goals in PV include preventing thrombosis, controlling blood counts, improving symptoms, and avoiding progression to post-PV MF or AML.

Key learning: Based on the consensus, the steering group agreed on a set of recommendations for defining disease progression and modification in PV. These recommendations aim to improve understanding of the disease course to support the development of more effective therapeutic strategies.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content