All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.

  TRANSLATE

The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb and Incyte. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Efficacy and safety of nuvisertib in MF: Preliminary phase I/II data

By Sheetal Bhurke

Share:

Sep 9, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in myelofibrosis.


 

Treatment-emergent toxicities, including cytopenias, present a limitation in the management of myelofibrosis (MF) with emerging combination therapies, highlighting the need for novel approaches. 

Early clinical studies of nuvisertib, an investigational, oral, highly selective PIM1 kinase inhibitor, alone and in combination with ruxolitinib shows reduction in spleen size and bone marrow (BM) fibrosis. During the European Hematology Association (EHA) 2025 Congress, June 12–15, 2025, Milan, IT, Lindsay Rein presented preliminary data from a phase I/II study (NCT04176198) evaluating the efficacy and safety of nuvisertib in patients with primary or secondary MF (N = 77).

In the dose-escalation phase, nuvisertib dose ranged from 480 mg daily to 720 mg twice daily. In the efficacy population (n = 18), the evaluable dose was 720 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability, with key secondary endpoints including spleen volume reduction, total symptom score, BM fibrosis change, and pharmacokinetics. 

 

Key learnings

No DLTs were observed at any dose. The most common AEs were diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting – transient and managed with supportive care. Grade 3/4 diarrhea and nausea were reported in 5.2% and 1.3% of patients, respectively. 

SVR, SVR25, and TSS50 were reported in 67% (12/18), 22.2% (4/18), and 44.4% (8/18) of patients, respectively. Improvement on PGIC was shown in 83.3% (15/18) of patients. Responses were durable, and 33% (25/77) of patients remain on active treatment at ≥12 months.

Mean Hb ≥1.0 g/dL for ≥12 weeks and mean platelet count ≥30 × 109/L for ≥28 days without RBC/platelet transfusion were observed in 24% (6/25) and 26.7% (8/30) of patients, respectively. Grade ≥1 improvement in BM fibrosis was seen in 42.9% (12/28) of patients.

Longitudinal analysis showed symptom reduction correlated with cytokine modulation (p < 0.001) of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines (e.g. decreased EN-RAGE and MIP1β and increased adiponectin).

Nuvisertib was well tolerated, with clinical activity including spleen, symptom, and hematological and durable responses in patients with R/R MF. Emerging data support its clinical development as monotherapy and in combination with JAK inhibitors.

AE, adverse event; BM, bone marrow; DLT, dose-limiting toxicity; EHA, European Hematology Association; EN-RAGE, extracellular newly identified receptor for advanced glycation end-products binding protein; Hb, hemoglobin; JAK, Janus kinase; MF, myelofibrosis; MIPIβ, macrophage inflammatory protein 1 beta; PGIC, Patient Global Impression of Change; RBC, red blood cell; R/R, relapsed/refractory; SVR, spleen volume reduction; SVR25, ≥25% SVR; TSS50, ≥50% total symptom score reduction.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

Which of the following clinical endpoints do you consider most valuable for guiding your clinical decision-making and optimizing patient care, when assessing anemia in myelofibrosis clinical studies?