TRANSLATE

The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

How can chromosomal and mutation abnormalities in chronic MPN inform clinical decision making?

Featured:

Alessandro M. VannucchiAlessandro M. Vannucchi

Dec 27, 2022

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in myeloproliferative neoplasms.


During the 64th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, the MPN Hub was pleased to speak to Alessandro Vannucchi, University of Florence, Florence, IT. We asked, How can chromosomal and mutation abnormalities in chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) inform clinical decision making?

How can chromosomal and mutation abnormalities in chronic MPN inform clinical decision making?

Vannucchi opens by outlining the history of the discovery of gene mutations within MPN that have led to the development of the three classes of driver mutations: JAK2, MPL, and CALR. Vannucchi continues by discussing the recent developments and improvements in scoring criteria methods and considers the applications of these two factors in combination for patients with primary myelofibrosis. Vannucchi concludes that with improved scoring systems and the addition of novel molecular values, this can allow for patients to be better stratified within risk categories.

Your opinion matters

On average, how many patients with myelofibrosis do you see in a month?