All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your MPN Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Patients diagnosed with essential thrombocythemia (ET) experience thrombocytosis and risk reduction is therefore a key goal for therapeutic intervention. Currently, the main risk stratification model as recommended by the European LeukemiaNet is the International Prognostic Score of thrombosis in ET (IPSET-t); however, to date there has been no specific tool developed to aid in the prediction of hemorrhagic risk. Below, we summarize a publication from Tosoni et al. in Annals of Hematology on a retrospective analysis to define both the incidence and risk factors connected to hemorrhagic events in patients with ET.
Key learnings |
|
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to MPN delivered to your inbox