All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.

  TRANSLATE

The MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by GSK, Novartis, Sobi and Takeda and supported through independent educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Blueprint Medicines, Incyte and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, Rahway, NJ, USA. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

JAK inhibitors after ruxolitinib failure in MF

By Amy Hopkins

Share:

Oct 13, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in myelofibrosis.


Results from a systematic review and pooled analysis evaluating the efficacy and safety of three Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi: fedratinib, momelotinib, and pacritinib) in adults with myelofibrosis (MF) after ruxolitinib failure were published in the British Journal of Haematology by Duminuco et al. In the efficacy analysis, outcomes were drawn from prospective phase III or pivotal phase II trials, while safety data were taken from pivotal phase III trials, supporting phase II/IIIb trials, and real-world cohorts. The primary endpoint was ≥35% reduction in spleen volume from baseline (SVR35) at Week 24.

Key data: Pooled SVR35 at Week 24 was 32.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 27.3–38.6; n = 266) for fedratinib, 15.8% (95% CI, 11.7–21.0; n = 234) for momelotinib, and 21.6% (95% CI, 13.8–32.3; n = 74) for pacritinib. SVR35 was significantly greater with fedratinib vs momelotinib (relative risk [RR], 2.07; 95% CI, 1.45–2.95; p < 0.0001) and was numerically greater than with pacritinib (RR, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.97–2.36; p = 0.08). Pooled ≥50% Total Symptom Score (TSS50) reduction rates were 32.8%, 25.3%, and 32.4% in the fedratinib, momelotinib, and pacritinib groups, respectively. Across an integrated safety dataset (n = 1,794), fedratinib showed the highest Grade ≥3 anemia (34.3% vs 21.2% and 8.0%, respectively) and any-grade diarrhea rate (56.6% vs 41.9% and 21.2%, respectively) vs pacritinib and momelotinib. Rates of Grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia were greatest with pacritinib (32.5%), followed by fedratinib (17.2%) and momelotinib (12.9%). Discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs) were comparable across agents (~15%–16%).

Key learning: In this pooled analysis, post-ruxolitinib JAKi demonstrate distinct efficacy and safety profiles, supporting treatment selection guided by clinical phenotypes.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

This content is accurate as of the date of publication and is not updated retrospectively. Please refer to the latest available evidence, guidelines, and relevant regulatory information when making clinical decisions.

Your opinion matters

Among patients with myelofibrosis and isolated anemia at presentation, with no indication for treatment with a JAK inhibitor, how often do you use anemia-directed treatments (EMAs, ESAs, danazol, etc.) as monotherapy?