All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your MPN Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Classical BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), including primary myelofibrosis (PMF), polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET), are typically characterized by stem-cell-derived clonal proliferation and driver mutations in Janus kinase 2 (JAK2V617F), calreticulin (CALRmut; includes CALRdel52 and CALRins5), or myeloproliferative leukemia virus oncogene (MPLmut) genes.
Interferon alpha (IFNα), particularly pegylated IFNα, has been shown to produce hematologic responses in ET, PV, and early PMF. Unlike cytoreductive and JAK inhibitor therapy, IFNα has been shown to decrease the variant allele frequency (VAF) of JAK2V617F in the blood cells of approximately 60% of patients, though its impact on CALRmut is uncertain.1
Mosca, et al. sought to identify factors that influence the molecular response rate to IFNα and to determine its molecular efficacy when faced with cells carrying driver mutations. Their work has recently been published in Blood and is summarized here.1
The team performed a prospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study of 48 patients being treated with pegylated-IFNα, including 21 patients with PV, 22 with ET, and five with PMF.
Two evaluations were performed:
Model calibration was performed using 40 patients with data from at least three time points and hypothesis testing was performed on all patients with at least five progenitor measurements for JAK2V617F
A compartmental mathematical model used:
Statistical inferences were used to distinguish three populations of patients based on disease mutations. Within each population, patient- specific parameters were estimated based on Bayesian hierarchical framework.
Characteristics of study participants and their hematologic responses to IFNα are detailed in Table 1.
Table 1. Patient characteristics and hematological response to IFNα*
Characteristic, % (unless otherwise stated) |
Patients |
---|---|
Median age (range), years |
53 (25–71) |
Median IFNα dose (range), µ/week |
71 (11–157) |
MPN type, n (%) |
|
PV |
21 (44) |
ET |
22 (46) |
PMF |
5 (10) |
Driver mutations |
|
JAK2V617F |
67 |
CALRmut |
25 |
MPLmut |
4 |
Hematologic response |
|
JAK2V617F |
78 |
CALRmut |
72 |
MPLmut |
100 |
Hematological non-responder |
|
JAK2V617F |
6 |
CALRmut |
7 |
CALRmut, calreticulin gene mutation; ET, essential thrombocythemia; IFNα, interferon alpha; JAK2V617F, janus kinase 2 mutation; MPLmut, myeloproliferative leukemia virus oncogene mutation; MPN, myeloproliferative neoplasm; PMF, primary myelofibrosis; PV, polycythemia vera. |
A total of 84,845 genotypes from progenitor derived colonies were analyzed. At a given time point the JAK2V617F VAF in platelets and granulocytes was correlated and was similar among all progenitor types. From the VAF data for platelets and granulocytes, Mosca, et al. assessed the dynamics of JAK2V617F, CALRmut and MPLmut cells during IFNα treatment and found that while CALRmut VAF remained stable, JAK2V617F VAF decreased over time in both the mature hematopoietic cells and the progenitors. CALRmut and JAK2V617F VAF became substantially different from each other following 600 days of treatment and the two MPLmut cases showed a visible molecular response over time.
For patients treated with higher IFNα doses, JAK2V617F VAF decreased substantially in progenitor cells, following an initial increase in some cases, with greatest responses seen from Day 1,000 after treatment initiation.
In contrast, a progressive and continuous decrease in JAK2V617F VAF was seen for patients treated with lower doses of IFNα. From around 600 days from treatment initiation, progenitors with homozygous JAK2V617F were significantly more sensitive to IFNα treatment than those with heterozygous JAK2V617F. CALRmut progenitors were not associated with a significant IFNα dosage effect.
The following inferences were made based on the mathematical modeling approach:
Inferred HSC dynamics supports the hypothesis that IFNα acts on mutated HSC. Also designed to provide insights into the IFNα mechanism of action, the model inferred that:
Mosca, et al. concluded that the efficacy of IFNα in exhausting mutated HSC is dependent on the driver mutation type, with varying degrees of response relating to the mutations harbored by HSCs. IFNα is more efficient at targeting homozygous than heterozygous JAK2V617F, and preferentially targets CALRins5 than CALRdel52. Dosage assessments in this study found that titration to a maximum tolerated dose was more likely to achieve a reduction in heterozygous JAK2V617F HSC, thereby achieving a hematologic response, suggesting that dose intensity should be maintained throughout treatment. Conversely there is no evidence to support high-dose IFNα treatment in patients with homozygous JAK2V617F HSC or in patients with CALRmut HSC.
Currently, the use of IFNα is guided by hematologic response and tolerability, rather than causal mutation, but the authors hope that this study will highlight the importance of understanding the differential effects of these mutations in MPN management.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to MPN delivered to your inbox