All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.

  TRANSLATE

The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb and Incyte. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Myelofibrosis: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio impact on prognosis and discontinuation of ruxolitinib

By Sabina Ray

Share:

Mar 12, 2024

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in myelofibrosis.


Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a reliable biomarker for survival in many diseases.1 Ruxolitinib, a first-in-class Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor, is used successfully in treating patients with myelofibrosis (MF); however, the impact on overall survival (OS) vs best available therapy varies between patients.

Here, we summarize a retrospective study published by Laganà et al.2 in European Journal of Haematology on the use of NLR as a biomarker for OS in patients with MF treated with ruxolitinib.

Study design2

  • Single center study in patients with chronic primary MF or secondary MF.
  • Baseline NLR was recorded, and patients were evaluated every 3 months until treatment cessation, and 6 months after treatment cessation.
  • Endpoints assessed included NLR correlation with complete spleen response and OS.

Key findings2

  • Included 140 patients:
    • 47% were male;
    • 25% had secondary MF rising from polycythemia vera and 29% after essential thrombocythemia; and
    • 70% had Janus kinase 2 mutated-MF and 11% had calreticulin-MF.
  • After 36.2 months median follow-up:
    • 60% achieved complete spleen response after a median of 8.22 months; however, baseline NLR was not a predictor of spleen response (p = 0.151); and
    • NLR was found to predict OS with patients having a baseline NLR ≥2 reporting a longer OS than patients with NLR <2.
  • Median OS was 32.5 months, and 31 deaths were reported
    • The two main causes of death were acute myeloid leukemia progression (41.9%) and infections (41.9%)
  • Discontinuation was reported in 41.4% (Figure 1).
  • Patients who discontinued treatment earliest for any reason except allogeneic transplantation had a baseline NLR <2 compared with NLR ≥2 (27.7 months vs not reached, respectively).

Figure 1. Causes of discontinuation in patients with chronic primary or secondary MF*

AML, acute myeloid leukemia; MF, myelofibrosis.
*Adapted from Laganà, et al.1

 

Key learnings 

  • Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio reported ahead of ruxolitinib treatment has potential to predict survival outcomes and treatment discontinuation in patients with myelofibrosis.
  • Results from various studies remain controversial and further prospective studies in larger cohorts are required to improve understanding and optimize use of this prognostic factor.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content