The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View mpn content recommended for you
GB2064 is an investigational, potential first-in-class, oral lysyl oxidase-like 2 (LOXL2) inhibitor intended for the treatment of patients diagnosed with myelofibrosis who are ineligible, intolerant, or refractory to Janus kinase inhibitor therapy. LOXL2 plays a key role in myelofibrosis, contributing to the fibrotic progression of disease via mediation of collagen crosslinking in tissue fibrosis. Recently, topline results from the phase IIa MYLOX-1 trial (NCT04679870), investigating the safety and efficacy of GB2064, were released. We summarize the key points below.
These topline results indicate that GB2064 elicits strong antifibrotic activity and inhibition of LOXL2 in a difficult-to-treat patient population. The safety profile was considered acceptable, and AEs were manageable. Further analysis is ongoing to determine the potential of subsequent clinical trial stages.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content