All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.
The MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by GSK, Novartis, Sobi and Takeda and supported through independent educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Blueprint Medicines, Incyte and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, Rahway, NJ, USA. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View MPN content recommended for you
Results from the randomized, open-label, phase III DALIAH trial (NCT01387763), evaluating pegylated interferon alpha-2 (peg-IFNα) vs hydroxyurea (HU) in 203 adults with newly diagnosed (ND) myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), were published in eClinicalMedicine by Knudsen et al. The primary endpoint was JAK2 V617F molecular response (MR) at 18, 36, and 60 months.
Key data: In the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis (HU, n = 38; peg-IFNα, n = 165), JAK2 V617F MR rates were similar between the HU and peg-IFNα groups at 18 months (19% vs 21%; p = 1.00), 36 months (19% vs 26%; p = 0.64), and 60 months (23% vs 24%; p = 1.00). In the per-protocol (PP) analysis, restricted to patients remaining on therapy, peg-IFNα vs HU demonstrated a superior MR at 36 months (56% vs 23%; p = 0.01) and 60 months (67% vs 35%; p = 0.03). From Month 36 onwards, median JAK2 V617F variant allele frequency (VAF) was lower with peg-IFNα vs HU (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between peg-IFNα vs HU in 12-month complete hematologic response (CHR) rate (p = 0.27) or bone marrow response (BMR) at 36 months (ITT, p = 0.49; PP, p = 1.00). At 60 months BMR was significantly higher with peg-IFNα vs HU in the ITT analysis (p = 0.01), but not in the PP analysis (p = 0.12). At 60 months, treatment discontinuation was significantly more frequent with peg-IFNα vs HU (65% vs 37%, p = 0.0019). Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 45% of patients receiving peg-IFNα vs 58% of patients receiving HU (p = 0.21).
Key learning: In the DALIAH trial, peg-IFNα and HU demonstrated similar MR rates in the ITT population, though peg-IFNα achieved superior long-term MRs among patients who remained on therapy through Month 60. These findings highlight the potential for long-term disease control with peg-IFNα in select patients with ND MPN.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
This content is accurate as of the date of publication and is not updated retrospectively. Please refer to the latest available evidence, guidelines, and relevant regulatory information when making clinical decisions.