TRANSLATE

The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Prevention and treatment of accelerated/blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms

By Dylan Barrett

Share:

Nov 22, 2024

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in myeloproliferative neoplasms.


Ph− MPN are clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders with a risk of progression to MPN-AP/BP, influenced by clinical, pathologic, cytogenetic, and molecular variables.1 A recent review in Haematalogica by Patel and Rampal discusses risk factors for progression, treatment strategies, response criteria, and considerations for future clinical trial design.1

Key learnings
The acquisition of high-risk mutations in the chronic phase of MPN plays a critical role in the progression to MPN-AP/BP, with mutations such as TP53ASXL1IDH1/2EZH2SRSF2, and SF3B1 having a prognostic impact.  
Allo-HSCT remains the only curative approach for disease progression, with optimal timing ideally being during the chronic phase or MPN-AP. 
There is heterogeneity in the treatment response assessment for patients with MPN-AP/BP, highlighting a need for harmonized response criteria. The authors propose OS, CMR, CCyR, CBR, PBR, and HI as clinical trial endpoints.  
As treatment data for patients with MPN-AP/BP is limited, the authors suggest the inclusion of MPN-AP/BP cohorts in early phase studies with patients with chronic phase MPN to identify novel therapies with promising clinical activity.  

Abbreviations: Allo-HSCT, allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; AP, accelerated phase; BP, blast phase; CBR, complete blast response; CCyR, complete cytogenetic response; CMR, complete molecular response; HI, hematological improvement MPN, myeloproliferative neoplasms; OS, overall survival; PBR, partial blast response; Ph−, Philadelphia chromosome-negative. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

On average, how many patients with myelofibrosis do you see in a month?