All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.
The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health, GSK, Sumitomo Pharma, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and Incyte. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View MPN content recommended for you
Real-world data from a retrospective cohort study investigating the outcomes and safety of ropeginterferon alfa-2b (ropegIFN) in 64 patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph−) myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) were recently published by Chang et al. in Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia. The cohort included patients with polycythemia vera (PV; n = 15), essential thrombocythemia (ET; n = 16), prefibrotic myelofibrosis (preMF; n = 5), and overt myelofibrosis (MF; n = 28).
Key data: After a median follow-up of 5.3 years, 36-month hematological response (HR) rates were 87% in PV, 75% in ET, 80% in preMF, and 47% in MF (p = 0.026). Best molecular response (MR) rates were 80% in PV, 60% in ET, 75% in preMF, and 42% in overt MF (p = 0.11). Median JAK2 variant allele frequency (VAF) declined significantly from 67.9% at baseline to 18.7% during follow-up (p < 0.001). Patients with MF harboring high-molecular-risk (HMR) mutations showed no HR (24 months; 0% vs 72%, p = 0.002) nor MR (24 months; 0% vs 18%, p = 0.4), alongside significantly worse median overall survival (OS; 5.3 months vs not reached; p < 0.001) and a significantly higher cumulative incidence of adverse events (AEs; 48% vs 7%, p < 0.001).
Key learning: RopegIFN demonstrated hematological and molecular efficacy across Ph− MPN subtypes, with a manageable safety profile; however, its effectiveness appears limited in patients with MF, particularly those with HMR mutations.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content