All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.

  TRANSLATE

The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health, GSK, Sumitomo Pharma, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and Incyte. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.  View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

ASH 2025 | What are the key findings from the 12-month primary endpoint analysis of the ROP-ET phase III study?

By Devon Else

Share:

Featured:

Jean-Jacques KiladjianJean-Jacques Kiladjian

Dec 10, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite the latest clinical data from the ROP-ET phase III trial.


Do you know... The 12-month analysis from the phase III ROP-ET trial, presented at ASH 2025, revealed what percentage of patients achieved the primary endpoint of durable hematologic and clinical response after 12 months?

During the 67th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, December 6–9, 2025, Orlando, US, the MPN Hub was pleased to speak with Jean-Jacques Kiladjian, Université Paris Cité, Paris, FR. We asked, What are the key findings from the 12-month primary endpoint analysis of the ROP-ET phase III study?

In this interview, Kiladjian first provided an overview of the phase III ROP-ET (NCT06514807) study design and key patient eligibility criteria. He then discussed the primary endpoint results, highlighting that the ROP-ET study met the primary endpoint – a composite durable hematologic and clinical response after 12 months. Finally, Kiladjian explored the safety profile of ropeginterferon alfa-2b observed in the study. 

ASH 2025 | What are the key findings from the 12-month primary endpoint analysis of the ROP-ET phase III study?

Key points

  • After 12 months, 48% of patients had durable hematologic and clinical response (primary endpoint).
    • Durable, complete hematological response was achieved in 65% of patients.
    • 96% of patients did not have a hemorrhagic or thrombotic event.
    • No patient experienced disease progression.
    • Durable improvement in symptoms was observed in 84% of patients.
  • Median platelet and leukocyte counts reduced rapidly and then remained stable until the 12-month endpoint.
  • Overall, 73% of patients experienced an adverse event (AE), with <1% experiencing a serious AE, and 2% discontinuing treatment due to treatment-related AEs.
  • Ropeginterferon alfa-2b is a potential therapeutic option for patients with essential thrombocythemia who require cytoreduction but cannot receive other available therapies.

This educational resource is independently supported by AOP Health. All content was developed by SES in collaboration with an expert steering committee. Funders were allowed no influence on the content of this resource.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content