All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your MPN Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Ruxolitinib is a Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor that is licensed for the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis (MF) and is effective in controlling MF-related splenomegaly and inducing hematological responses. The approval was based on results from the COMFORT-I and -II (NCT00952289 and NCT00934544) phase III trials.1 In the original phase I/II study of ruxolitinib (NCT00509899), 92% of patients discontinued treatment, mainly due to associated toxicities or lack of response/disease progression. Of these patients, 11% developed severe withdrawal symptoms during ruxolitinib discontinuation.2
Ruxolitinib discontinuation syndrome (RDS) occurs within 21 days of treatment stop and is characterized by an acute relapse of disease symptoms, accelerated splenomegaly, worsening of cytopenias, and occasional hemodynamic decompensation, including acute respiratory distress syndrome and shock.2 RDS occurs regardless of the ruxolitinib dose, tapering, and steroid usage.1
In order to investigate RDS in a real-world setting, a large cohort (N = 700) of patients with MF, treated with ruxolitinib across 21 mostly Italian hematology centers, were assessed. These results were presented by Francesca Palandri as oral presentation during the 25th European Hematology Association Annual Congress.1
Table 1. Patient characteristics at the time of ruxolitinib discontinuation1
BLCM, below left costal margin; Hb, hemoglobin; PLT, platelets; WBC, white blood cells |
|
Characteristic |
(n = 251) |
---|---|
Male, % |
60.6 |
Primary myelofibrosis, % |
39.8 |
> 70 years of age, % |
53.0 |
Hb < 10 g/dL, % |
68.5 |
Median PLT count, × 109/L (range) |
103 (3–976) |
PLT count < 100 × 109/L, % |
53.8 |
WBC count > 25 × 109, % |
27.5 |
Spleen > 10 cm BLCM, % |
45.8 |
Total symptom score > 20, % |
27.5 |
Ruxolitinib dose, mg twice daily, % |
|
20 |
15.1 |
15 |
15.6 |
10 |
23.1 |
5 |
46.2 |
Figure 1. RDS incidence1
RDS, ruxolitinib discontinuation syndrome
Figure 2. Outcomes and treatments for patients with mild and moderate RDS1
allo-HSCT, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; HMA, hypomethylating agent; HU, hydroxyurea; JAK2, Janus kinase 2; RDS, ruxolitinib discontinuation syndrome
Table 2. Treatment and outcome of patients with severe RDS1
BLCM, below left costal margin; CMV, cytomegalovirus; Hb, hemoglobin; HU, hydroxyurea; MF, myelofibrosis; MOF, multiple organ failure; PLT, platelets; PMF, primary myelofibrosis; PPV, post-polycythemia vera; RDS, ruxolitinib discontinuation syndrome; TSS, total symptom score; WBC, white blood cells |
|||
|
Case 1 |
Case 2 |
Case 3 |
---|---|---|---|
Age, years |
48 |
65 |
74 |
Gender |
Male |
Male |
Female |
MF type |
PPV |
PMF |
PMF |
Ruxolitinib dose, mg twice daily |
20 |
15, reduced to 10 |
10, reduced to 5 |
Duration of ruxolitinib, months |
6.2 |
39.6 |
3 |
Reason for discontinuation |
Thrombocytopenia |
Lack of response |
Thrombocytopenia |
Patient characteristics at ruxolitinib discontinuation |
|
|
|
Spleen size, cm BLCM |
15 |
14 |
14 |
TSS |
0/100 |
70 |
2 |
WBC count, × 109/L |
84.3 |
9.1 |
41.6 |
Hb, g/dL |
11 |
8.2 |
7.4 |
PLT count, × 109/L |
55 |
58 |
45 |
Ruxolitinib discontinuation |
Rapid decrease to 5 mg, then immediate stop, without steroids |
24 days of tapering with steroids |
Immediate stop |
Time to RDS, days |
1 |
3 |
2 |
RDS symptoms |
Spleen rupture, systemic symptoms, hyperleukocytosis |
Fever, dyspnea, confusion, dizziness |
Acute respiratory distress syndrome |
Treatment |
Splenectomy, no response to steroids and HU, rapid resolution after ruxolitinib 10 mg twice daily |
Steroids, rapid clinical improvement after ruxolitinib 10 mg twice daily |
Steroids, resolution of clinical symptoms after ruxolitinib 10 mg twice daily |
Follow up period, months |
48 |
19.2 |
3.6 |
Last contact |
Dead: MOF after cholecystectomy |
Alive: receiving ruxolitinib 15 mg twice daily |
Dead: CMV lung infection |
Table 3. Risk factors for RDS (univariate analysis)1
BLCM, below left costal margin; CI, confidence interval; Hb, hemoglobin; HR, hazard ratio; MF, myelofibrosis; PPV, post-polycythemia vera; PET, post–essential thrombocythemia; PLT, platelets; TSS, total symptom score Bold font indicates statistical significance. |
||
Risk factor |
HR (95% CI) |
p value |
---|---|---|
Age ≥ 70 years |
0.79 (0.41–1.56) |
0.51 |
Male gender |
0.92 (0.46–1.83) |
0.83 |
PPV/PET MF |
1.05 (0.53–2.07) |
0.89 |
Hb < 10 g/dL |
1.73 (0.75–3.99) |
0.19 |
PLT < 100 × 109/L |
2.83 (1.28–6.23) |
0.01 |
Tapering |
1.89 (0.96–3.71) |
0.06 |
Ruxolitinib dose ≤ 10 mg twice daily |
4.95 (1.51–16.20) |
0.01 |
Spleen ≥ 10 cm BLCM |
2.15 (1.06–4.37) |
0.03 |
TSS ≥ 20 |
0.73 (0.31–1.69) |
0.46 |
Severe RDS is rare and occurs in approximately 1% of patients. Diagnosis of RDS is crucial, as ruxolitinib re-challenge may rapidly improve the clinical status of the patient. As mild or moderate RDS mainly occurred within a few days from discontinuation and affected > 10 % of patients, any other therapy should be started as close as possible to ruxolitinib discontinuation. RDS is often associated with an increase in spleen size and may therefore indicate residual JAK disease control activity, allowing to identify patients who could still benefit from second-line JAK2 inhibition.
A limitation of the study was that RDS prevention strategies were infrequent and inconsistent across the different centers. This may have prevented the detection of a correlation between tapering and RDS reduction. The implementation of consistent discontinuation strategies may allow for better RDS prevention in the future.
Expert opinion
For more information on how to manage RDS, watch our video with Francesca Palandri:
How do you manage ruxolitinib discontinuation syndrome?
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to MPN delivered to your inbox