All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your MPN Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Cytokine storm induced by COVID-19 infection has an increased risk for mortality and may lead to severe complications requiring intensive care, intubation, or mechanical ventilation. Ruxolitinib is a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor currently approved for the treatment of myelofibrosis and acute graft-versus-host disease.
The efficacy and safety of adding ruxolitinib to standard of care (SoC) for patients with COVID-19-associated cytokine storm versus placebo plus SoC has been under investigation in a phase III, randomized, multi-center RUXCOVID study (NCT04362137). The initial results of this trial, which is now completed, did not demonstrate a clinical benefit in favor of ruxolitinib.1
Eligible patients were given an oral dose of 5 mg ruxolitinib twice daily for 14 days and were followed for 29 days following randomization.
The study failed to meet its primary endpoint of improving the proportion of patients who experienced severe COVID-19-related complications such as death, respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, or admission to intensive care unit. The decrease in rate was very similar among the two comparator arms by Day 29 (12.0% in the ruxolitinib arm versus 11.8% in the placebo arm; odds ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.48–1.73; p = 0.769). There was no clinical benefit in terms of reduced mortality rate by end of the follow-up period or any improvement in time to recovery in the experimental arm. The safety profile of ruxolitinib in this setting was acceptable, with good tolerability.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to MPN delivered to your inbox