All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.
The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb and Incyte. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View mpn content recommended for you
Hydroxyurea and anagrelide remain the standard treatments for essential thrombocythemia (ET), with no new therapy approved in the US since anagrelide. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b (ropeg) is a novel interferon-based therapy approved for polycythemia vera due to its cytoreductive efficacy and direct anticlonal activity. During the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting, Ruben Mesa presented topline results from the phase III SURPASS-ET trial (NCT04285086), which assessed the safety and efficacy of ropeg vs anagrelide in patients with ET.1 Patients diagnosed with high-risk ET (WHO 2016 criteria) who were either resistant or intolerant to hydroxyurea and were IFN-α naïve were eligible (N = 174). Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive ropeg SC, Q2W (n = 91) or oral anagrelide (n = 83). The primary endpoint was modified ELN response at 9 and 12 months. Secondary endpoints included JAK2V617F and CALR allele burden, symptom improvements based on MPN-SAF TSS, thromboembolic events, and safety.
|
Key learnings |
A higher proportion of patients in the ropeg group achieved a modified ELN response compared to anagrelide (42.9% vs 6.0%; p = 0.0001). Response rates for individual ELN parameters were higher for ropeg vs anagrelide. |
In the ropeg group, mean JAK2V617F allele burden decreased from 33.7% at baseline to 25.3% at 12 months, while in the anagrelide group, it increased from 37.3% at baseline to 39.7% at 12 months. |
Ropeg vs anagrelide showed higher ≥25% symptom reduction in 58.4% vs 46.5% and ≥50% symptom reduction in 53.2% vs 39.5% of patients at 12 months. |
Major ET-related thrombotic and cardiovascular events were lower in the ropeg vs anagrelide groups (1.1% vs 10.0% and 0% vs 7.5%, respectively). |
The safety profile of ropeg was comparable to anagrelide, with Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurring in 23.1% vs 33.8% of patients, while TESAEs occurred in 14.3% vs 30.0% of patients, respectively. |
Ropeg shows superior efficacy and safety as a second-line therapy for ET compared with anagrelide, offering a potential therapeutic option for patients with high-risk ET, with further investigation warranted. |
Abbreviations: ASCO, American Society of Clinical Oncology; CALR, calreticulin; ELN, European LeukemiaNet; ET, essential thrombocythemia; IFN-α, interferon alpha; MPN-SAF TSS, myeloproliferative neoplasm symptom assessment form total symptom score; PV, polycythemia vera; Q2W, twice a week; SC, subcutaneous; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event; TESAE, treatment-emergent serious adverse event; WHO, World Health Organization.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content