All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your MPN Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Positive topline data have been announced from the global, randomized, open-label, phase III SURPASS-ET trial (NCT04285086).1 This trial assessed the safety and efficacy of ropeginterferon alfa-2b, a monopegylated, long-acting interferon that is currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of patients with polycythemia vera,2 vs anagrelide as a second-line therapy for patients with essential thrombocytosis (ET).1 In total, 174 patients with ET were enrolled and randomized to receive ropeginterferon alfa-2b (n = 91) or anagrelide (n = 83).1
The primary endpoint was met; among the intent-to-treat population, a higher proportion of patients in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b arm achieved a durable response at Months 9 and 12 using the modified European LeukemiaNet (ELN) criteria compared with the anagrelide arm (42.9% vs 6.0%; p = 0.0001).1 The safety profile of ropeginterferon alfa-2b was manageable, with a lower rate of treatment-related serious adverse events compared with anagrelide (2.2% vs 10%).1
In terms of secondary endpoints, the JAK2V617F allelic burden decreased from 33.7% at baseline to 25.3% at 12 months in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b arm, compared with a decrease from 39.7% to 37.3% in the anagrelide arm.1
Results from this trial will be submitted to the FDA as supporting evidence for a product label expansion for ropeginterferon alfa-2b in patients with ET.1
The safety and efficacy of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in patients with ET is also being evaluated in the single-arm, multicenter, phase IIb EXCEED-ET trial (NCT05482971) in North America, with data expected in the second half of 2025.1
Subscribe to get the best content related to MPN delivered to your inbox