All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your MPN Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Patients with myelofibrosis (MF) who are ineligible, intolerant, or fail to respond to Janus kinase (JAK) inhibition have limited treatment options and poor outcomes, with a median overall survival of 13 months.1 Thus, there is a great unmet medical need for the development of alternative treatments for this patient subset.
The second mitochondrial-derived activator of caspases (SMAC) mimetic LCL161 has shown, in preclinical studies, to induce apoptosis in MF cells by binding to the cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein-1 (cIAP1) and the X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP).2 The efficacy and safety of the LCL161 was assessed in patients with relapsed or refractory MF of high/intermediate risk in a phase II trial (NCT02098161), and results were presented during the 61st American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting & Exposition (ASH 2019) by Pemmaraju Naveen. This article is based on data presented at the ASH meeting and may supersede the data in the published abstract.
Table 1. Patient baseline characteristics from the LCL161 phase II trial2
ASXL1, additional sex combs-like 1; CALR, calreticulin; DNMT3A, DNA-methyltransferase 3 alpha; EZH2, enhancer of zeste homolog 2; IMiD, immunomodulatory drug; IPSS, International Prognostic Scoring System; JAK, Janus kinase; MPL, myeloproliferative leukemia; RAS, rat sarcoma; SCT, stem cell transplant; TET2, ten-eleven translocation 2; TP53, tumor protein p53 |
|
Patient characteristic (N = 50) |
|
---|---|
Median age, years (range) |
72 (56–85) |
Males, % |
56 |
Median hemoglobin levels, g/dL (range) |
8.7 (4.4–12) |
Median leukocytes, K/μL (range) |
5.9 (1.1–38) |
Median platelets, K/μL (range) |
52 (6–1,365) |
Spleen size, cm (range) [n = 30] |
12 (1–30) |
Prior therapies, % ≥ 2 prior treatments Prior JAK inhibitor Prior IMiD® Prior SCT |
66 56 24 4 |
IPSS at baseline, % Intermediate 1 risk Intermediate 2 risk High risk |
4 22 74 |
Molecular mutation, % JAK2 V617F CALR MPL W515L ASXL1 TET2 DNMT3A RAS EZH2 TP53 |
64 12 12 28 15 11 9 9 2 |
Cytogenetics, % Diploid Unfavorable Insufficient |
34 18 8 |
Table 2. Key efficacy responses from the LCL161 phase II trial2
ORR, overall response rate *Response criteria based on the International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (2013); all responses must have lasted for ≥ 12 weeks to qualify †Results at a median follow-up of 22.7 months (range, 1.5–55.2+) |
|
Efficacy response (N = 50)* |
|
---|---|
ORR, n (%) |
15 (30) |
Symptom clinical improvement, n (%) |
11 (22) |
Anemia clinical improvement, n (%) Median time to anemia response, months (range) Median anemia response duration, months (range) |
6 (12) 3.1 (0.9–9.1) 8.4 (5.5–28.6) |
Spleen clinical improvement |
1 |
Cytogenetic remission |
1 |
Median overall survival† |
Not reached |
Median treatment cycles received†, n (range) |
5 (1–61+) |
Table 3. Toxicities reported in the LCL161 phase II trial2
TEAEs, treatment-emergent adverse events |
|
Adverse event |
% |
---|---|
Non-hematological adverse events, Grade 1–2 |
|
Nausea/vomiting Fatigue Dizziness/vertigo Pruritis Diarrhea Pain Skin eruption/rash Fever/flu-like syndrome |
76 46 30 24 26 24 24 38 |
Non-hematological TEAEs, Grade 3–4 |
|
Syncope Nausea/vomiting |
4 2 |
Hematological TEAEs, Grade 3–4 |
|
Thrombocytopenia Anemia |
6 4 |
The final results of this phase II trial show that the SMAC mimetic LCL161 led to an ORR of 30% in patients with relapsed/refractory MF of intermediate/high risk. The median overall survival was not reached at a median follow-up of approximately 22 months. It is planned to investigate LCL161 in combination with other targeted therapies, such as ruxolitinib, to further enhance efficacy in patients with MF.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to MPN delivered to your inbox