All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.

The MPN Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your MPN Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

2023-06-30T08:55:35.000Z

FREEDOM trial: Primary analysis

Jun 30, 2023
Share:
Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in myelofibrosis.

Bookmark this article

Fedratinib, an oral Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitor previously reviewed on the MPN Hub, is currently under investigation for the treatment of patients diagnosed with myelofibrosis (MF) and with prior ruxolitinib exposure.1 Long-term data regarding fedratinib in the setting are currently limited due to early treatment termination.1

In order to address this, Gupta et al.1 recently published a preliminary analysis from the single-arm phase IIIb FREEDOM trial (NCT03755518) investigating the safety and efficacy of fedratinib in patients with MF previously treated with ruxolitinib. The authors also discussed strategies to mitigate gastrointestinal adverse events (AE), thiamine level reductions, and potential encephalopathy.1 We summarize the key findings in the article below. For more information on how to manage AEs associated with fedratinib, watch our previous interview with Ruben Mesa.

Study design

  • Key eligibility criteria:
    • Confirmed primary MF diagnosis, post-polycythemia vera MF, or post-essential thrombocythemia MF with ≥3 months prior ruxolitinib treatment
    • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≤2
    • Intermediate or high-risk
    • Baseline platelet count ≥50 x 109/L
  • Fedratinib 400 mg once daily in 28-day cycles
  • Strategies for AE mitigation:
    • Antiemetics
    • Antidiarrheals
    • Thiamine supplementation
    • Surveillance for potential encephalopathy

Results

  • A total of 38 patients were included in the analysis.
  • Baseline patient characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Baseline patient characteristics*

Characteristic, % (unless otherwise stated)

All patients
(N = 38)

Median age, years

68.5

Median treatment duration, weeks

38

Diagnosis

              PMF

60.5

              Post-PV MF

23.7

              Post-ET MF

15.8

DIPSS classification

              Intermediate-1

34.2

              Intermediate-2

47.4

              High risk

18.4

Median spleen volume, mL

1,831.6

DIPSS, Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System; ET, essential thrombocythemia; MF, myelofibrosis;
PMF, primary myelofibrosis; PV, polycythemia vera.

*Data from Gupta, et al.1

  • At the end of Cycle 6, 25.7 patients achieved ≥35% spleen volume reduction (SVR)
    • 62.9% of patients achieved a best overall response of ≥35% SVR.
  • Of the patients who achieved ≥35% SVR, 86.4% maintained a response at cutoff.
  • At the end of Cycle 3, 58.3% of patients achieved ≥50% reduction in total symptom score
  • At the end of Cycle 6, 44.4% of patients achieved ≥50% reduction in total symptom score.
  • A total of 89.5% of patients had one treatment-emergent AE; 7.9% of which were serious.

Common AEs are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Common adverse events* 

*Data from Gupta, et al.1

  • Most gastrointestinal AEs were of Grade 1 or 2 severity.
  • Reduction in thiamine levels were also of Grade 1 or 2 severity.
    • There were no treatment discontinuations due to thiamine levels.
  • A total of two deaths occurred during treatment and seven occurred during follow-up.
    • None of the deaths were deemed to be study related.

Conclusion

Primary analysis from the FREEDOM study highlights durable spleen and symptom responses as well as SVR. Gastrointestinal AEs were easily mitigated, and no cases of encephalopathy were reported. Although the sample size for the analysis was small, the overall safety and efficacy data collected support the use of fedratinib in patients with MF and prior ruxolitinib exposure.

  1. Gupta V, Yacoub A, Verstovsek S, et al. Safety and efficacy of fedratinib in patients with primary (P), post-polycythemia vera (post-PV), and post-essential thrombocythemia (post-ET) myelofibrosis (MF) previously treated with ruxolitinib: Primary analysis of the FREEDOM trial. Blood. 2022;140(Suppl 1):3935-3937. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2022-156669

Your opinion matters

What do you consider to be the highest unmet need for patients with myelofibrosis?​
9 votes - 86 days left ...

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to MPN delivered to your inbox