All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.
The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb and Incyte. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View MPN content recommended for you
Anemia, a common complication in myelofibrosis (MF), is associated with fatigue and reduced quality of life (QoL). The phase II ACE-536-MF-001 (MF-001) trial (NCT03194542) demonstrated that luspatercept improved hemoglobin (Hb) levels in patients with MF. However, the relationship between Hb levels and anemia-related QoL remains unclear. During the European Hematology Association (EHA) 2025 Congress, June 12–15, 2025, Milan, IT, Haifa Al-Ali presented data from a post hoc analysis of the MF-001 trial assessing the relationship between Hb levels and QoL in non-transfusion-dependent (NTD) patients with MF treated with luspatercept.1 Data from two cohorts were analyzed (N = 36). Eligible patients had Hb levels ≤9.5 g/dL recorded on ≥3 separate days and received no transfusions in the 84 days prior to their first dose of luspatercept. Both cohorts received 1.0 mg/kg luspatercept on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle. QoL was evaluated using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Anemia tool, with fatigue and anemia subscales.
|
Key learnings |
Meaningful improvements in FS (coefficient 4.32; p < 0.001) and AnS (coefficient 5.26; p = 0.001) were more likely with an increase in Hb levels from baseline of ≥1.5 g/dL compared with an increase of <1.5 g/dL. |
A change from baseline in Hb of ≥1.5 g/dL (p < 0.01) or reaching a target Hb level of ≥10 g/dL (p < 0.05) were predictors of improvement in FS and AnS scores. |
Among evaluable patients with a mean Hb increase ≥1.5 g/dL, 66.7% and 83.3% achieved at least one meaningful improvement in FACT-FS and FACT-AnS during a clinical response, respectively. |
These findings demonstrate a clinically meaningful relationship between increased Hb levels and anemia-related QoL, highlighting the QoL benefits of luspatercept in NTD patients with MF. |
AnS, Anemia subscale, EHA, European Hematology Association; FACT, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy; FS, fatigue subscale; Hb, hemoglobin; MF, myelofibrosis; NTD, non-transfusion-dependent; QoL, quality of life.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
Your opinion matters
The phase III SURPASS-ET trial demonstrated the efficacy of ropeginterferon alfa-2b (ropeg) as a second-line treatment for essential thrombocythemia (ET). Of your patients with ET, what proportion are you currently treating with ropeg?