TRANSLATE

The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Incidence of blast-phase disease in myelofibrosis, according to anemia severity

By Oscar Williams

Share:

Feb 13, 2024

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new publication investigating blast phase disease in MPN


Anemia affects almost all patients during the natural progression of myelofibrosis (MF) and is a key factor linked with increased risk of blast-phase (BP) transformation. Around 30–45% of patients who receive ruxolitinib treatment for MF develop Grade 3–4 anemia; however, data surrounding BP progression in patients treated with ruxolitinib are limited.1

Palandri et al.1 published a study in Cancer reporting on the incidence of BP according to anemia severity in a large real-world cohort of patients diagnosed with primary and secondary MF, treated with ruxolitinib. We summarize the key points below.

Study design1

  • Retrospective study
  • Patients with MF (N = 886) were administered ruxolitinib outside of clinical trials
  • Data was collected between 2013 and 2022

Key findings1

  • Median ruxolitinib duration was 2.4 years
  • Median follow-up duration was 3.1 years
  • At ruxolitinib initiation, 67.4% of patients had anemia
    • 10.2% were red blood cell (RBC) transfusion-dependent
    • 11.1% had an RBC transfusion requirement
  • In total, 13.2% of patients experienced BP evolution
  • The global BP incidence rate ratio (IRR) was 3.74 per 100 patient-years
  • The IRR of BP in patients with no anemia was 2.34 per 100 patient-years vs 4.22 (p = 0.02), 4.89 (p = 0.009), and 4.93 (p = 0.006) per 100 patient-years in patients with Grade 1, Grade 2 and Grade 3–4 anemia, respectively
  • The IRR of BP per 100 patient-years was higher in patients who were RBC transfusion-dependent than patients with an RBC transfusion requirement or patients who were RBC transfusion independent (5.03 vs 4.48 vs 3.52 per 100 patient-years, respectively)
  • A univariate regression model identified that patients with either a platelet count <100×109/L or anemia had a higher probability of BP evolution (p = 0.006 and p = 0.33, respectively)
  • Patients with no anemia had the highest 5-year PFS rate, while patients with Grade 3–4 anemia had the lowest (Figure 1)

Figure 1. 5-year progression-free survival rates according to grade of anemia in patients with MF*

PFS, progression-free survival.
*Adapted from Palandri, et al.1

  • During the first 6 months, 9.2% of patients who had no anemia at the start of therapy developed Grade 3–4 anemia during treatment with ruxolitinib

Key learnings

  • There was a linear correlation between anemia severity and incidence of BP disease in patients with MF treated with ruxolitinib (N = 886)
  • Absence of anemia was associated with a lower risk of BP transformation
  • Rate of BP progression was unaffected by ruxolitinib therapy itself
  • Acquisition of severe anemia during ruxolitinib therapy was a significant predictor of BP transformation

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content