All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.
The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View mpn content recommended for you
Splenomegaly poses a higher risk of delayed engraftment, poor graft function, and non-relapse mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) in patients with myelofibrosis (MF).1 JAK1/2 inhibitors such as ruxolitinib and fedratinib may be used to reduce spleen volume and thereby improve post-transplant outcomes.
However, dosing of these agents is limited in cytopenic patients with MF. Pacritinib is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for adults with MF and a platelet count of <50 × 109/L, indicating potential use for spleen volume reduction in cytopenic patients.1
At the 49th Annual Meeting of the EBMT, Nico Gagelmann presented a poster highlighting data from the phase III PERSIST-2 trial on the efficacy of pacritinib for spleen volume reduction in patients with MF across the cytopenic spectrum.1 The MPN Hub is pleased to summarize key data from this presentation.
A total of 57 patients treated with pacritinib 200 mg twice daily (BID) were evaluated for spleen volume reduction over 24 weeks, stratified by baseline blood counts:
Initial baseline characteristics are outlined in Table 1.
Table 1. Baseline patient and disease characteristics*
BID, twice daily; JAK, Janus kinase. |
|
Characteristic, % (unless otherwise stated) |
Pacritinib 200 mg BID |
---|---|
Median age, years |
67 |
Primary myelofibrosis |
75 |
Prior JAK inhibitor |
42 |
Median palpable spleen length, cm (below left costal margin) |
14 |
Baseline platelet count <50 × 109/L |
37 |
Baseline platelet count 50 to <100 × 109/L |
42 |
Baseline hemoglobulin <8 g/dL |
18 |
Baseline hemoglobulin 8 to <10 g/dL |
37 |
Baseline hemoglobulin ≥10 g/dL |
46 |
Table 2. Overall spleen volume reduction regardless of cytopenia*
*Data from Gagelmann, et al.1 |
|
Spleen volume reduction, % |
Overall response |
---|---|
>35% |
28 |
>25% |
40 |
>10% |
79 |
>0% |
84 |
All platelet subgroups achieved an overall spleen volume reduction by the end of Week 12 and maintained a stable median platelet count. Patients with a baseline platelet count of <50 × 109/L achieved the highest rate of spleen volume reduction, with 45% achieving SVR35.
The use of pacritinib to reduce spleen volume was shown to be effective in patients with MF across the cytopenic spectrum. However, the degree of efficacy was influenced by baseline platelet count, with patients with a count of <50 × 109/L achieving the highest rates of SVR35. Data from PERSIST-2 support the use of pacritinib prior to allo-HSCT to reduce splenomegaly and mitigate the risk of its related poor outcomes and may be particularly beneficial in patients with cytopenic MF.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content