All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.

  TRANSLATE

The MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by GSK, Novartis, AOP, Sobi and Takeda and supported through independent educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Blueprint Medicines, Incyte and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, Rahway, NJ, USA. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Peri-transplant ruxolitinib for patients with MF undergoing allo-HSCT

By Amy Hopkins

Share:

Sep 16, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in myelofibrosis.


Results from a retrospective, single-center study evaluating the addition of peri-transplant ruxolitinib (periRux) to traditional graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis in 68 adults with myelofibrosis (MF) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) were published in Transplantation and Cellular Therapy by Mozaffari Jovein et al. The primary endpoint was GvHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse rates, and engraftment.

Key data: Patients receiving periRux (n = 14) demonstrated a non-significant trend toward improved 1-year GRFS (51.0% vs 31.5%) and OS (92.86% vs 74.1%), as well as lower 1-year relapse rates (7.1% vs 13.8%) and NRM (7.1% vs 16.7%) compared with patients who did not receive periRux (n = 54). The overall prevalence of acute GvHD (aGvHD) and chronic GvHD (cGvHD) at 1 year was 33.8% and 27.9%, respectively. Grade III–IV aGvHD rates were similar between groups (28.6% vs 35.2%), whereas moderate-to-severe cGvHD at 1 year was lower in the periRux vs no periRux group (7.1% vs 33.3%). Clearance of driver mutations and/or complete donor chimerism (CC) was achieved in 84% of patients at Day 30 and Day 365.

Key learning: The addition of ruxolitinib to standard GvHD prophylaxis in patients with MF undergoing allo-HSCT appears feasible and is associated with favorable trends in relapse, survival, and moderate-to-severe cGvHD rates. These findings support evaluation in prospective, randomized trials.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

Do you include basal serum tryptase (bST) testing in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with MPN?