All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.

  TRANSLATE

The MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by GSK, Novartis, AOP, Sobi and Takeda and supported through independent educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Blueprint Medicines, Incyte and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, Rahway, NJ, USA. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Phase III SURPASS-ET 2-year results: Early vs delayed ropeginterferon alfa-2b in high-risk ET

By Amy Hopkins

Share:

Aug 14, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in essential thrombocythemia.


Results from the randomized, active-controlled, multicenter, open-label phase III SURPASS-ET (NCT04285086) extension study evaluating early vs delayed ropeginterferon alfa-2b in patients with high-risk essential thrombocythemia (ET) were presented by Gill at the European Hematology Association (EHA) 2026 Congress, June 11–14, 2026, Stockholm, SE. Patients either remained on ropeginterferon alfa-2b (continuous group; n = 80) or switched from anagrelide to ropeginterferon alfa-2b at 12 months (switched group; n = 39). Endpoints included modified European LeukemiaNet (ELN) Response Criteria rate, JAK2 V617F allele burden, occurrence of thromboembolic events, and progression-free survival (PFS). 

Key data: Modified ELN response rates with total symptom score (TSS) increased from 17.0% at Month 12 to 60.0% at Month 24 in the switched group vs 57.7% to 60.0% in the continuous group. Without TSS, response rates were 85.0% in the continuous group vs 55.0% in the switched group at 24 months. Peripheral blood count remission rates were 85.0% in the continuous group vs 65.2% in the switched group at 24 months. JAK2 V617F allelic burden gradually reduced over time in both groups. The estimated PFS rates at 24 months were 76.9% in the continuous group vs 43.1% in the switched group. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 22.5% vs 51.3% of patients, respectively. 

Key learning: Continuous ropeginterferon alfa-2b demonstrated durable efficacy and manageable safety over 2 years. Patients switching from anagrelide to ropeginterferon alfa-2b demonstrated higher response rates and reduced a JAK2V617F allelic burden compared with prior anagrelide therapy.  

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

Do you include basal serum tryptase (bST) testing in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with MPN?