All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.

The MPN Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your MPN Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
2023-07-31T13:34:20.000Z

PV: Real-world patient characteristics and treatment patterns in Taiwan

Jul 31, 2023
Share:
Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in polycythemia vera.

Polycythemia vera (PV) is a classical Philadelphia-negative, chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm clinically characterized by primary erythrocytosis and subsequent hypervolemia, hyperviscosity, thrombocytosis, and leukocytosis. It is also associated with the risk of thromboembolism, progression to myelofibrosis, and transformation to acute myeloid leukemia.

Patients with PV can be stratified into low- and high-risk subgroups based on age and history of thrombosis; classification and treatment recommendations for each risk category are summarized in Figure 1. Although treatment options for PV are limited in Taiwan, the most common treatment approaches include aspirin, phlebotomy, and hydroxyurea (HU).

The MPN Hub previously reported on the overall treatment goals for patients with PV. Below, we summarize an article published by Tsai et al. in Therapeutic Advances in Hematology,1 on patient characteristics and phlebotomy and HU treatment patterns of patients with PV in Taiwan.

Figure 1. Classification and treatment recommendations for low- and high-risk PV* 

HU, hydroxyurea; PV, polycythemia vera.
*Data from Tsai, et al.1

Study methods

  • Nationwide, cross-sectional study that identified patients with PV from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan (NHIRD) between 2016 and 2017.
    • Retrospective data also retrieved from 2001 to 2017.
  • Investigated several demographic variables and treatment patterns overall, by sex and by risk group.
  • Demographic variables examined included: age at diagnosis, age at enrollment, duration of disease, history of thrombosis prior to diagnosis, occurrence of thrombosis since diagnosis, and history of bone marrow aspirate/biopsy, comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, hepatitis B/C, ischemic heart disease, chronic kidney disease, and splenomegaly.
  • Treatment patterns studied were the annualized frequency of phlebotomy and daily dose of HU received during 2016 and 2017, as well as treatment duration between 2001 and 2017.

Results

Patient characteristics

  • In total, 2,647 patients were enrolled; 1,288 of whom were low-risk and 1,359 who were high-risk.
  • The prevalence rate was approximately 10.8 cases per 100,000 people; and the estimated incidence rates in 2016 and 2017 were 2.41 and 2.65 cases per 100,000 people, respectively.
  • There was a significantly higher occurrence of thrombosis between 2016 and 2017 and a higher number of reported deaths in the high- versus low-risk subgroup. Patient characteristics between 2016 and 2017 by risk group are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Patient characteristics*

Characteristic,
% (unless otherwise stated)

<60 years with no history of thrombosis

(n = 1,288)

<60 years with history of thrombosis

(n = 101)

≥60 years with no history of thrombosis

(n = 1,107)

≥60 years with history of thrombosis

(n = 151)

Low vs high risk

p value

Sex

 

 

 

 

<0.0001

Male

75.7

74.3

63.5

57.6

 

Female

24.3

25.3

36.5

42.4

 

Age at diagnosis

 

 

 

 

<0.0001

Mean (SD)

41.7 (11.8)

47.4 (8.8)

65.7 (8.8)

66.8 (8.5)

 

Median (Q1–Q3)

43 (35–51)

49 (42–54)

65 (60–71)

67 (61–72)

 

Age during 2016–2017

 

 

 

 

<0.0001

Mean (SD)

44.0 (12.1)

50.9 (8.6)

70.4 (7.9)

72.0 (8.1)

 

Median (Q1–Q3)

46.0 (38–54)

54.0 (47–57)

69.0 (64–76)

72.0 (65–77)

 

BM aspiration at diagnosis

 

 

 

 

<0.0001

Yes

15.8

22.8

25.7

22.5

 

Comorbidities

 

 

 

 

 

Diabetes

19.5

29.7

36.3

31.8

<0.0001

Hypertension

47.0

68.3

78.8

80.8

<0.0001

Hyperlipidemia

45.6

53.5

52.3

60.3

0.0012

Hepatitis B

10.7

12.9

8.3

6.0

0.0416

Hepatitis C

2.0

5.9

2.6

4.0

0.1022

Ischemic heart disease

17.5

26.7

40.6

50.3

<0.0001

Chronic kidney disease

7.5

14.9

18.2

22.5

<0.0001

Splenomegaly

3.0

4.0

4.0

2.0

0.3037

Thrombosis (2016–2017)

0.62

27.7

1.8

30.5

<0.0001

Disease progression

 

 

 

 

 

Myelofibrosis

0.5

0

0.7

1.3

0.5358

Acute myeloid leukemia

0.3

0

0.6

0

0.4136

Death

1.6

1.0

7.9

9.9

<0.0001

BM, bone marrow; Q1, lower quartile; Q3, higher quartile; SD, standard deviation.
*Data from Tsai.1
High-risk patients were aged ≥60 years and/or had a history of thrombosis; low-risk
patients were aged <60 years with no history of thrombosis.

Treatment patterns

Of the 2,647 evaluable patients, 647 received phlebotomy and 489 received HU treatment; 528 (19.9%) received both phlebotomy and HU, and the remaining 983 received neither treatment. Both male and female patients who received phlebotomy only were younger than those receiving only HU or combined therapy. The type of treatment varied between sexes and between risk groups from 2016 and 2017 (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Treatment patterns of phlebotomy and HU (A) by risk groups and (B) by sex* 

HU, hydroxyurea.
*Data from Tsai.1

In the retrospective analysis between 2001 and 2017, 1,504 patients received phlebotomy with a median duration of 3.4 years, and a total of 1,080 patients received HU treatment with a median duration of 4.6 years; the duration of HU was significantly longer in high-risk versus low-risk patients (p < 0.0001). In the 365-day period between 2016 and 2017, 1,162 patients and 663 patients received annualized frequency of phlebotomy and an average daily dose of HU, respectively; treatment patterns are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2. Annualized frequency of phlebotomy and average daily dose of HU in a 365-day period*

Characteristic,
n (unless otherwise stated)

Male

Female

p value

Low risk

High risk

p value

Annualized phlebotomy frequency (N = 1,162)

Patients overall, n

797

365

 

497

665

 

With concurrent HU

392

284

0.0017

192

484

0.1772

Mean ± SD

3.0 ± 2.3

2.4 ± 1.8

 

2.9 ± 2.1

2.7 ± 2.2

 

Median (min-max)

2 (1–13)

2 (1–10)

 

2 (1–11)

2 (1–13)

 

Without HU

405

81

0.1224

305

181

0.3134

Mean ± SD

3.2 ± 2.4

2.7 ± 1.6

 

3.0 ± 2.4

3.2 ± 2.2

 

Median (min–max)

3 (1–15)

3 (1–7)

 

2 (1–15)

3 (1–13)

 

Averaged HU daily dose (N = 663)

Patients overall

353

310

 

163

500

 

With phlebotomy

168

108

0.012

83 (50.9)

193

0.002

Mean ± SD

604.2 ± 315.3

516.5 ± 255.0

 

654.1 ± 321.3

533.6 ± 277.2

 

Median (Q1–Q3)

519.7 (361.0–807.7)

479.2 (322.0–673.6)

 

637.8 (469.6–860.6)

486.9 (343.4–701.9)

 

Maximum

2,000

1,470

 

2,000

1,470

 

Without phlebotomy

 

 

 

 

 

0.02

Mean ± SD

593.7  ± 286.1

539.6 ± 294.3

 

633.1 ± 325.1

547.9 ± 279.7

 

Median (Q1–Q3)

526.9 (390.2–786.1)

482.8 (321.8–701.6)

 

582.4 (364.6–930.4)

497.8 (336.8–699.0)

 

Maximum

1,367

1,481

 

1,411

1,481

 

HU, hydroxyurea; Q1, lower quartile; Q3, higher quartile; SD, standard deviation.
*Data from Tsai.1
High-risk patients were aged ≥60 years and/or had a history of thrombosis; low-risk patients
included those with aged <60 years with no history of thrombosis.

The prevalence rates of PV in Taiwan were higher than in South Korea (10.9 cases vs 2.8–5.4 cases per 100,000), similar to Norway (10.9 vs 9.2 cases per 100,000), but lower than that in the United States (10.9 vs 22–57 cases per 100,000).

The mean age at diagnosis for patients with PV in Taiwan (53.4 years) was similar to other Asian populations, with a reported mean of 54.0 years and 53.7 years in China and South Korea, respectively. Conversely, the mean age of patients in Taiwan was younger when compared with Western populations, with an observed age at diagnosis of 64.3 years in Germany, 71.5 years in Canada, and 73 years in the United Kingdom.

Consistent with previous reports, there was a higher prevalence of male patients in this study, although the difference in proportion for this study (70:30) were greater than other populations: South Korea (60:40), Japan (57:43), China (54:46), Denmark (56:44), New Zealand (52:48), and the United States (58:42).

This study reported lower incidences of thrombotic events than those in an international study including patients from Austria, Italy, and the United States (2.2% is the overall incidence rate of thrombotic events in Taiwan versus 12% and 19% for postdiagnosis arterial and venous thrombosis, respectively, in a respective study). Additionally, this study reported higher mortality rates compared with the general population >60 years (4.1 vs 2.8 per 100 persons per year) – similar rates to the ECLAP study (NCT01645124) with 4.1 vs 3.2 per 100 persons per year, and lower rates than in Norway (4.1 vs 8.2 per 100 persons per year).

The distribution of phlebotomy treatment in low- and high-risk groups were lower compared with patients in the REVEAL study (NCT01252953), with 43.7% and 45.1% versus 70.4% and 53.4%, respectively. On the other hand, HU treatment in low- and high-risk groups were higher when compared with a US-based study (20.5% and 55.4% vs 18.9% and 42.0%), but lower when compared to the REVEAL study (20.5% and 55.4% vs 33.9% and 58.2%).

Conclusion

Overall, this analysis provided a real-world insight into the clinical landscape of patients with PV in Taiwan, including the distribution of patient characteristics and phlebotomy and hydroxyurea treatment patterns. Patient characteristics differed to Caucasian populations in previous studies, and similarities and differences were observed in treatment patterns – notably in prevalence, age at diagnosis, sex ratio, incidence of thrombosis and mortality when compared with other countries. This study provides rationale for further investigation into the genetics of PV among racial groups. Ultimately, a better understanding of patient characteristics and treatment patterns of PV across different regions will better inform clinical practice and improve patient outcomes.

  1. Tsai TH, Yu L HL, Yu MS, et al. Real-world patient characteristics and treatment patterns of polycythemia vera in Taiwan between 2016 and 2017: A nationwide cross-sectional study. Ther Adv Hematol. 2023; 14:20406207231179331. DOI: 1177/20406207231179331

Your opinion matters

HCPs, what is your preferred format for educational content on the MPN Hub?
4 votes - 21 days left ...

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to MPN delivered to your inbox