All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your MPN Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
Bookmark this article
Ruxolitinib is a JAK1/2 inhibitor currently approved for the treatment of myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera, and graft-versus-host disease.1 During the worldwide coronavirus pandemic, the agent has been under investigation for use in patients with COVID-19. The phase III DEVENT trial (NCT04377620) is currently evaluating the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib 5 mg and 15 mg plus standard of care (SoC) compared with SoC alone in patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) on mechanical ventilation.
Results announced recently1 indicate that the primary endpoint of mortality due to any cause up to Day 29 was not met when comparing the two treatment arms versus placebo in the overall study population (N = 211), despite an encouraging trend in favor of ruxolitinib. However, there was a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in mortality rates at both ruxolitinib doses compared with placebo when analyzing the U.S. population only (n = 191), which represented 91% of the overall study population:
In addition, post hoc analysis performed with pooled data from both ruxolitinib arms compared with placebo demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in mortality:
The safety profile was consistent with patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and with ruxolitinib treatment. The most common adverse events in the ruxolitinib arms versus placebo included anemia (20.7% vs 22.2%), elevated alanine aminotransferase (14.6% vs 13.3%), elevated aspartate transaminase (14.0% vs 8.9%), and hypertension (11.6% vs 11.1%), respectively.
In the light of these findings, access to ruxolitinib for patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS via an Expanded Access Program (EAP) will be discussed with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
In another phase III RUXCOVID trial, ruxolitinib did not show a clinical benefit compared with placebo in preventing complications in patients with COVID-19-associated cytokine storm.
Subscribe to get the best content related to MPN delivered to your inbox