TRANSLATE

The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

REVIVE trial meets primary endpoint: Significant improvements with rusfertide versus placebo

By Oscar Williams

Share:

Apr 11, 2023

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in polycythemia vera.


Recent results from the phase II REVIVE trial (NCT04057040) investigating the hepcidin mimetic rusfertide compared with placebo in patients with polycythemia vera showed significant improvements in response rates in patients treated with rusfertide.1

A total of 53 patients from part 1 of the trial were enrolled in the blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal portion of the trial (part 2) for a duration of 12 weeks.1 Of the enrolled patient cohort, 69.2% of patients recorded a response to rusfertide, in comparison with 18.5% of patients responding to placebo (p = 0.0003). Responders were defined as patients having completed 12 weeks of double-blind treatment while maintaining hematocrit control without phlebotomy. Moreover, during the 12-week period, 92.3% of patients remained phlebotomy-free (p = 0.0003).1

Rusfertide was well tolerated, with localized injection site reactions comprising the most common adverse events reported.1 No new safety signals were identified since the last report at ASH 2022 by Pemmaraju et al.2 For a summary of the currently reported treatment-related adverse events, check out this previous MPN Hub article.

Further analysis of this phase II trial and data from the phase III VERIFY trial (NCT05210790) will determine the role of rusfertide in the future treatment of patients with polycythemia vera.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content