All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.

  TRANSLATE

The MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health, GSK, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and Incyte. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.  View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

RUX-MF real-world study subanalysis: Prognostic impact of cytopenia in MF treated with ruxolitinib.

By Amy Hopkins

Share:

Mar 24, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in myelofibrosis.


Results from a subanalysis of the real-world, multicenter RUX‑MF study (NCT06516406), evaluating the prognostic impact of persistent and treatment-emergent cytopenia in 879 patients with myelofibrosis (MF) treated with ruxolitinib for ≥6 months, were published in Cancer by Palandri et al. The objectives of this analysis were to assess the prognostic impact of cytopenia during the first 6 months of therapy, to compare clinical outcomes between treatment-emergent anemia and thrombocytopenia, to evaluate the prognostic significance of hemoglobin improvement in patients with isolated baseline anemia, and to assess the impact of changes in cytopenia status on symptom burden. Study participants were categorized into four groups: never cytopenic (n = 317), treatment-emergent cytopenia (n = 273), persistent cytopenia (n = 235), and improved anemia (n = 54). 

Key data: In the overall cohort, cytopenia prevalence increased from 40.6% at baseline to 57.8% after 6 months. Median overall survival (OS) was longest in patients who were never cytopenic (8.07 years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.04–9.29) and lowest in patients with persistent cytopenia (3.68 years; 95% CI, 3.08–4.41; p < 0.001). Among patients with treatment-emergent cytopenias, those who developed anemia alone had a median OS of 6.15 years, while those with isolated thrombocytopenia had a median OS of 4.33 years (p = 0.008). Patients who were never cytopenic or had improved cytopenia demonstrated the greatest decrease in Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score (MPN‑SAF TSS). 

Key learning: Results demonstrate that cytopenia trajectory monitoring during the first 6 months of ruxolitinib therapy may be a clinically actionable prognostic tool in MF. Future prospective studies with molecular, cytogenetic, and supportive care data are warranted to expand the understanding of cytopenia dynamics in MF.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content