All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.

  TRANSLATE

The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Ruxolitinib for the treatment of MF: Case-based recommendations for adverse event management

By Jen Wyatt Green

Share:

Jun 5, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in myelofibrosis.


 

While ruxolitinib remains the standard of care for intermediate-2 and high-risk myelofibrosis (MF), its use is frequently complicated by cytopenias, infections, and progressive disease. 

In a case-based review published in eJHaem, Butler et al. present seven anonymized clinical scenarios that reflect common, real-world challenges associated with ruxolitinib, such as anemia, thrombocytopenia, infection risk, secondary malignancy, and disease progression. The authors provide real-world clinical insights from over 15 years of experience managing patients with MF treated with ruxolitinib.

 

Key learnings1

Anemia and thrombocytopenia are common with ruxolitinib; management strategies include ESAs, transfusions, and dose adjustments tailored to symptom burden and erythropoietin levels.

Ruxolitinib increases infection risk, including reactivation of latent infections; pre-treatment screening, vaccination, and prophylaxis are essential in at-risk patients.

Progressive splenomegaly or symptom relapse warrant reassessment for disease progression, molecular testing, and consideration of alternative JAK inhibitors or clinical trials.

As MF treatment evolves, ruxolitinib remains a key option; real-world data continue to inform strategies to mitigate toxicities and optimize long-term outcomes. Novel therapies are being explored in the context of ruxolitinib failure.

Abbreviations: ESA, erythropoiesis-stimulating agent; JAK, Janus kinase; MF, myelofibrosis.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content