All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.

  TRANSLATE

The MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health, GSK, and Novartis, and supported through educational grants from Blueprint Medicines and Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.  View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Ruxolitinib in MF with anemia: Real-world treatment patterns and survival outcomes

By Nathan Fisher

Share:

Apr 2, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in myelofibrosis.


Results from a retrospective, real-world analysis of the US Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived deidentified database, evaluating baseline patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes with ruxolitinib in adults with myelofibrosis (MF) with (n = 175) or without (n = 208) baseline anemia, were published in Leukemia & Lymphoma by Kuykendall et al.  

Key data: Baseline anemic vs nonanemic patients demonstrated a trend toward starting ruxolitinib at 5 mg twice daily (31% vs 15%) and remaining on <20 mg/day throughout the first 3 months (25% vs 16%; p = 0.09), with a numerically shorter median time to first dose reduction (5.6 vs 12.8 months; p = 0.46) and discontinuation (16.7 vs 24.8 months; p = 0.26). Median overall survival (OS) was shorter with baseline anemia (37.4 vs 64.9 months; p < 0.001), with ruxolitinib <20 vs ≥20 mg/day during the first 3 months (40.1 vs 53.1 months; p < 0.05), and with new/worsening anemia on treatment, in all patients regardless of baseline anemia status (hazard ratio [HR], 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18–2.40; p < 0.01). 

Key learning: These real-world data suggest that both baseline and on-treatment anemia are associated with lower ruxolitinib dose intensity and poorer survival in MF, supporting consideration of alternative therapies when anemia limits maintenance of effective ruxolitinib dosing. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content