All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.
The MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by GSK, Novartis, AOP, Sobi and Takeda and supported through independent educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Blueprint Medicines, Incyte and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, Rahway, NJ, USA. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View MPN content recommended for you
Results from the global, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III SENTRY trial (NCT04562389), evaluating selinexor + ruxolitinib (n = 235) vs placebo + ruxolitinib (n = 118) in patients with Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi)-naïve myelofibrosis (MF), were presented by Claire Harrison at the European Hematology Association (EHA) 2026 Congress, June 11–14, 2026, Stockholm, SE. The coprimary endpoints were spleen volume reduction ≥35% (SVR35) and change in absolute total symptom score (AbsTSS; excluding fatigue) at Week 24.
Key data: At Week 24, SVR35 was achieved by 49.8% of patients in the selinexor + ruxolitinib arm vs 28.0% in the placebo + ruxolitinib arm (odds ratio [OR], 2.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60–4.17; one-sided p < 0.0001). The change in AbsTSS from baseline to Week 24 was similar between groups (−9.9 vs −10.9; one-sided p = 0.825). Overall survival (OS) favored selinexor + ruxolitinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95% CI, 0.19–1.00; nominal one-sided p = 0.022). Variant allele frequency (VAF) reduction ≥20% at Week 24 was higher with selinexor + ruxolitinib than placebo + ruxolitinib (32.0% vs 23.9%) and was associated with achieving SVR35 (nominal one-sided p < 0.001). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 70.1% of patients in the selinexor + ruxolitinib vs 50.0% in the placebo + ruxolitinib arms.
Key learning: Selinexor + ruxolitinib achieved rapid, deep and sustained SVR35, with an early OS signal but no additional TSS benefit, vs placebo + ruxolitinib in JAKi-naïve MF, representing a novel treatment strategy in this setting.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content