All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.
The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb and Incyte. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View MPN content recommended for you
Results from a multicenter European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry study, involving 2,454 patients with myelofibrosis (MF) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) between 2012 and 2021, were published by Sobieralski et al. in Bone Marrow Transplantation. The study explored the association between the transplant conditioning intensity (TCI) score and transplant outcomes.
Key data: Patients receiving TCI-intermediate/high intensity regimens had similar overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97–1.30) and progression-free survival (HR 1.00; 95% CI, 0.88–1.14) compared with TCI-low regimens. However, TCI-intermediate/high regimens were associated with lower cumulative incidence of relapse (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.61–0.91; p = 0.008) and higher non-relapse mortality (NRM; HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.04–1.48; p = 0.02).
Key learning: While higher intensity TCI regimens are associated with lower relapse incidence, this benefit is offset by increased NRM, resulting in no overall survival advantage. However, the TCI index may enable a personalized approach to conditioning regimen selection by balancing relapse risk with patient frailty.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content