The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View mpn content recommended for you
A Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) registry-based study evaluated the impact of donor type on allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) outcomes in adult patients with myelofibrosis (MF).1 This analysis included 1,032 patients who received allo-HSCT with either a matched sibling donor (MSD; n = 298), haploidentical donor (Haplo; n = 119), matched unrelated donor (MUD; n = 551), or mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD; n = 64) between January 2013 and December 2019. Results from this analysis were published in Blood Advances by Jain et al.1 |
Key learnings |
The estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 68.8%, 59%, 61.3%, and 55.2% with MSD, Haplo, MUD, and MMUD, respectively (p = 0.03). |
Multivariable analysis demonstrated that allo-HSCT with MSD was associated with improved OS in the first 3 months post-transplant (Haplo: hazard ratio [HR], 5.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.54–13.20; MUD: HR, 4.48; 95% CI, 2.25–8.92; MMUD: HR, 5.24; 95% CI, 1.49–18.42; p < 0.001). There was no significant OS difference between the three non-MSD donor types in the first 3 months, and no difference between all donor types beyond 3 months post transplant. |
The use of MSD was associated with a lower incidence of graft failure than Haplo (HR, 6.11; 95% CI, 2.98–12.54; p <0.001) and MUD (HR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.20–4.51; p = 0.01), and lower non-relapse mortality (NRM) than Haplo (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.09–2.68), MUD (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.14–2.18), and MMUD (HR, 1.71; 05% CI, 0.98–2.97; p = 0.03). The NRM rates were similar between patients who received allo-HSCT with Haplo, MUD, and MMUD. |
Relapse and disease-free survival were similar between all donor types. Additionally, in the subset of patients who underwent allo-HSCT within 24 months of diagnosis (n = 481), OS was not associated with donor type. |
The improved survival in the early post-transplant period with allo-HSCT with MSD was mainly driven by improved engraftment and lower NRM. Results suggest that allo-HSCT with a Haplo donor and post-transplant cyclophosphamide in patients with MF is a viable alternative to MUD and MMUD, particularly for ethnic minorities underrepresented in donor registries. Additionally, timely transplantation without delaying for a fully matched donor is recommended to improve outcomes. |
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
Your opinion matters
On average, how many patients with myelofibrosis do you see in a month?