All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.

  TRANSLATE

The MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by GSK, Novartis, AOP, Sobi and Takeda and supported through independent educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Blueprint Medicines, Incyte and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, Rahway, NJ, USA. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

TRANSFORM-1 phase III study: Navitoclax + ruxolitinib in JAKi-naïve MF

By Megan Moore

Share:

Aug 21, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in myelofibrosis.


Results from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase III TRANSFORM-1 study (NCT04472598), evaluating navitoclax + ruxolitinib (Nav + Rux; n = 125) vs placebo + Rux (n = 127) in Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi)-naïve adults with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis (MF) were published in Blood by Pemmaraju et al. The primary endpoint was ≥35% spleen volume reduction (SVR) at Week 24 from baseline (SVR35W24). 

Key data: SVR35W24 was achieved by 63.2% of patients in the Nav + Rux group vs 31.5% of those in the placebo + Rux group (p < 0.0001). The mean change in Total Symptom Score (TSS) at Week 24 was −10.2 vs −11.6, respectively (p = 0.2852). Median overall survival (OS) was not estimable (NE) with Nav + Rux vs 48.5 months with placebo + Rux (hazard ratio [HR], 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75–2.08; nominal log-rank p = 0.3867). Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 90.3% of patients in the Nav + Rux group vs 79.2% of those in placebo + Rux group. The most common Grade 3/4 AEs were thrombocytopenia (54.0% in the Nav + Rux group vs 19.2% in the placebo + Rux group), anemia (49.2% vs 44.0%), neutropenia (40.3% vs 8.8%), and diarrhea (5.7% vs 0%). Cytopenias were generally manageable and reversible with dose adjustments. 

Key learning: In JAKi-naïve adults with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF, Nav + Rux approximately doubled the SVR35W24 rate vs placebo + Rux, though no significant difference in symptom burden or OS was observed. Higher rates of hematologic AEs occurred with Nav + Rux, although these were generally manageable with dose adjustments. These findings highlight the challenge of translating deeper spleen responses into broader clinical benefit. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

Do you include basal serum tryptase (bST) testing in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with MPN?