TRANSLATE

The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

ASH2023 abstracts: What’s hot in MPN?

By Oscar Williams

Share:

Dec 4, 2023


To help navigate the exciting content being presented at the 65th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, the MPN Hub Steering Committee members have provided their recommendations for the top abstracts to look out for in MPN.

Saturday, December 9

1792

Use of combination therapies Including the XPO1 inhibitor selinexor in is a potential effective therapeutic strategy to treat myelofibrosis patients

Min Lu

1794

Combinatorial BCL-2/BCL2L1 expression predicts clinical response to ruxolitinib in myelofibrosis

Giacomo Coltro

Sunday, December 10

619

Firstline treatment with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy in patients with polycythemia vera: Pre-specified interim analysis of the randomized phase 2b ruxobeat clinical trial of the German Study Group for myeloproliferative neoplasms (GSG-MPN)

Steffen Koschmieder

620

Transform-1: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, international phase 3 study of navitoclax in combination with ruxolitinib versus ruxolitinib plus placebo in patients with untreated myelofibrosis

Naveen Pemmaraju

622

Selinexor plus ruxolitinib in JAK inhibitor (JAKi)-Naïve patients with myelofibrosis: long term follow up from XPORT-MF-034 suggestive of disease modification

Srinivas K. Tantravahi

628

Pelabresib in combination with ruxolitinib for Janus kinase inhibitor treatment-naïve patients with myelofibrosis: Results of the MANIFEST-2 randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study

Raajit K. Rampal

3158

Modulation of biomarkers by BET Inhibitor, BMS-986158, including JAK2 variant allele frequency (VAF), bone marrow (BM) fibrosis, and reversal of abnormal cytokine production in intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis (MF)

Si Tuen Lee-Hoeflich

3204

Efficacy and safety of fedratinib in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib: Results from the phase 3 randomized FREEDOM2 study

Claire N Harrison

3207

Impact of symptom benefit and transfusion response on survival in myelofibrosis patients treated with pacritinib: PERSIST-2 landmark survival analysis

Helen Ajufo

Monday, December 11

746

Final analysis of the Daliah Trial: A randomized phase III trial of interferon-α versus hydroxyurea in patients with MPN

Trine Alma Knudsen

748

Impact of Cytoreductive drugs upon outcomes in a contemporary cohort of adolescent and young adults with essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera

Claire N Harrison

4533

Prognostic significance and clinical correlations of myeloid mutations in myelofibrosis based on their functional class

Paola Guglielmelli

5174

Effect of new or worsening anemia on clinical outcomes in 2233 patients with myelofibrosis treated with ruxolitinib in the Expanded-Access Jump study

Vikas Gupta

ASH 2023 Top Abstracts

Please click the button below to download the document

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

On average, how many patients with myelofibrosis do you see in a month?