All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.

  TRANSLATE

The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health, GSK, Sumitomo Pharma, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and Incyte. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.  View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Clinical characteristics and driver mutations in patients with ET ± JAK2V617F and/or CALR mutations

By Nathan Fisher

Share:

Mar 6, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in essential thrombocythemia.


Results from a single-center, cross-sectional registry analysis, comparing clinical features, outcomes, and potential driver mutations in patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) with and without JAK2V617F and/or CALR mutations, were published in Hematology by Thammayot et al. The analysis included 162 patients diagnosed with ET between 2007 and 2024 (JAK2 mutated, n = 99; JAK2/CALR unmutated, n = 39); whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed in a subset of patients with JAK2V617F/CALR-unmutated disease (n = 15). The primary objective was to compare clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with and without JAK2V617F and CALR mutations. The secondary objective was to identify potential driver mutations in patients with unmutated disease using WES. 

Key data: Patients with JAK2V617F/CALR-unmutated ET were significantly younger than those with JAK2V617F-mutated ET (mean, 53.7 vs 61.1 years; p = 0.012). The overall response rate (ORR) was 79% in patients with JAK2V617F/CALR-unmutated ET vs 88% in those with JAK2V617F-mutated disease, while the rate of treatment non-response was significantly higher with unmutated ET (30.77% vs 11.11%; p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in the rates of hydroxyurea (HU) intolerance/resistance, progression to myelofibrosis (MF), leukemic transformation, new thrombotic events, or new bleeding between the mutated and unmutated cohorts, while secondary malignancy was more common in patients with unmutated disease (p = 0.02). With a median follow-up of 159.6 months, median overall survival (OS) was similar between patients with vs without JAK2V617F and/or CALR mutations (12.6 years vs 13.5 years, respectively; p = 0.63). Among 15 patients with JAK2V617F/CALR-unmutated ET and selected for WES, somatic variants were detected in 93.3%. Changes in CALR and MPL were among potential driver mutations identified.  

Key learning: Overall, clinical characteristics and outcomes were largely comparable between patients diagnosed with ET with and without JAK2V617F and/or CALR mutations, while WES identified additional candidate driver mutations in patients with JAK2V617F/CALR-unmutated ET. These findings support consideration of broader genomic profiling to improve molecular classification and inform longitudinal monitoring in this setting. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content