All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.

  TRANSLATE

The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health, GSK, Sumitomo Pharma, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and Incyte. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.  View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

CMWP-EBMT European survey on allo-HSCT practices for MF

By Amy Hopkins

Share:

Jan 21, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in myelofibrosis.


Results from a European survey of high-volume transplant centers (N = 19) performing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for patients with myelofibrosis (MF), conducted on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party (CMWP) of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), were recently published in Bone Marrow Transplantation by Rampotas et al. The study aimed to assess how individual transplant centers integrate Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) into transplant protocols, manage splenomegaly prior to allo-HCT, and make decisions around transplantation. 

Key data: Management approaches varied considerably across centers. Most centers (68%) routinely initiated JAKis, primarily ruxolitinib (79%), prior to conditioning for splenomegaly reduction and symptom control; 58% of centers continued this treatment throughout conditioning. For ruxolitinib intolerant/resistant patients, 42% of centers indicated that they would switch to another JAKi, while 37% of centers reported that they would proceed to allo-HCT without introduction of a new therapy. The remaining centers favored enrollment into clinical trials or individualized decision-making. The majority of centers (58%) reported that they do not routinely restart JAKi therapy after transplant. Experience with novel agents in the pre-transplant setting, including bromodomain and extra-terminal inhibitors (BETi) and B-cell lymphoma-2 inhibitors (BCL2i), was limited, with 21% and 26% of centers reporting experience with BETis and BCL2is, respectively. JAKi therapy was reported to have a perceived positive impact on transplant timing and outcomes by 79% of centers; however, disease progression during transplantation delays were reported by 58% of centers. 

Key learning: Substantial heterogeneity exists in real-world MF allo-HSCT practice across European centers, encompassing timing decisions, splenomegaly management, and integration of novel therapies. Harmonized, multidisciplinary guidelines are needed to optimize transplant timing and outcomes. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content